Abstract:Abstract A 38-year-old auditor was referred for patch testing for a suspected hair dye reaction following development of a florid eczematous reaction on her face after a hair dye appointment. This reaction predominantly affected her cheeks, with the left more so than the right, extending to just below her eye. She also had mild eye swelling. The description and photographs taken at the time were atypical for a hair dye reaction, and on further questioning she revealed she had been sat in close proximity to someone undergoing acrylic nail treatment during the aforementioned hair appointment. We undertook patch testing to our baseline, anti-infective, excipient, hairdressing, fragrance, acrylic nail, cosmetic, photopatch and perianal series. Positive results were observed for 14 acrylates found in acrylic nails, namely methyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, bisphenol A dimethacrylate 2%, bisphenol A glycidyl dimethacrylate 2%, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate, tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate, butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, and triethylene glycol diacrylate. No reactions were observed to any hair dyes on patch testing. Skin prick testing for para-phenylenediamine (PPD) was also negative, excluding a type 1 allergy to PPD. She reported prior but infrequent use of acrylic nails, the last instance being over a year ago. It is therefore likely that the patient became sensitized through these exposures, leading to a pronounced reaction following subsequent airborne exposure to acrylates. An increasing incidence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to acrylates has been noted, particularly among nail technicians and consumers. Although airborne contact dermatitis to acrylates is rare, it has been reported in occupational settings involving nail technicians and dental nurses, and in manufacturing. Facial dermatitis or dermatitis in exposed areas without direct allergen contact has been documented. Additionally, four cases of respiratory sensitization with acrylate-induced occupational asthma have been reported in conjunction with ACD. Respiratory problems were often alleviated with mask usage, but airborne contact dermatitis posed greater challenges, prompting job changes. Efforts to collect sensitizers using air pumps for vapours and filters for airborne aerosols have seen limited success. This unusual case underscores the diverse clinical presentations of acrylate sensitivity and emphasizes the importance of promptly detecting the allergen to prevent further exposure. Awareness of airborne allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates is useful in occupational disease reviews. Additionally, efforts should be made to minimize airborne methacrylate concentrations to reduce sensitization risk.

Contact allergic dermatitis to skin adhesive after CIED upgrade procedure

Contact dermatitis in hospital patients

[Experiences of Applying Home Monitoring for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices].

Allergy to Surgical Implants

CD05 Consort allergic contact dermatitis to occupational acrylates

Assessing and Managing Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury in Patients with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter

Recurrent Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Bacitracin Used in Pocket Irrigation During Breast Reconstruction Surgery

Assessing and Managing Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury in Patients with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: A Case Series

Outer insulation failure in a multilumen ICD lead.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices in female patients: Esthetic, breast implant, and anatomic considerations

Red Breast Syndrome and Acellular Dermal Matrix

CD08 ‘If it’s not the hair maybe it’s in the air?’ A case of allergic contact dermatitis from airborne exposure to acrylates

Cosmetic outcomes and quality of life in children with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Further Evidence of Severe Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Isobornyl Acrylate While Using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

New device, 'old' allergens. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the Dexcom G7 glucose sensor

Allergic Contact Dermatitis Reaction to Permanent Tattoo Containing Paraphenylenediamine: A Case Report

Candidemia in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: Uncertainty in Management Based on Current International Guidelines

Incorporation of Ceragenins into Medical Adhesives and Adhesive Scar Tape to Prevent Microbial Colonization Common in Healthcare-Associated Infections

CD03 Watch out! Allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates in a smart watch

Abstract 15148: Contemporary Trends of Antibacterial Envelope Use to Prevent Cardiac Implantable Device Infection: Insights From the National Readmission Database

Severe conjunctival allergic reaction to polyglactin 910 sutures following strabismus surgery: A case report