Abstract:Abstract A 38-year-old auditor was referred for patch testing for a suspected hair dye reaction following development of a florid eczematous reaction on her face after a hair dye appointment. This reaction predominantly affected her cheeks, with the left more so than the right, extending to just below her eye. She also had mild eye swelling. The description and photographs taken at the time were atypical for a hair dye reaction, and on further questioning she revealed she had been sat in close proximity to someone undergoing acrylic nail treatment during the aforementioned hair appointment. We undertook patch testing to our baseline, anti-infective, excipient, hairdressing, fragrance, acrylic nail, cosmetic, photopatch and perianal series. Positive results were observed for 14 acrylates found in acrylic nails, namely methyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, bisphenol A dimethacrylate 2%, bisphenol A glycidyl dimethacrylate 2%, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate, tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate, butyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, and triethylene glycol diacrylate. No reactions were observed to any hair dyes on patch testing. Skin prick testing for para-phenylenediamine (PPD) was also negative, excluding a type 1 allergy to PPD. She reported prior but infrequent use of acrylic nails, the last instance being over a year ago. It is therefore likely that the patient became sensitized through these exposures, leading to a pronounced reaction following subsequent airborne exposure to acrylates. An increasing incidence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to acrylates has been noted, particularly among nail technicians and consumers. Although airborne contact dermatitis to acrylates is rare, it has been reported in occupational settings involving nail technicians and dental nurses, and in manufacturing. Facial dermatitis or dermatitis in exposed areas without direct allergen contact has been documented. Additionally, four cases of respiratory sensitization with acrylate-induced occupational asthma have been reported in conjunction with ACD. Respiratory problems were often alleviated with mask usage, but airborne contact dermatitis posed greater challenges, prompting job changes. Efforts to collect sensitizers using air pumps for vapours and filters for airborne aerosols have seen limited success. This unusual case underscores the diverse clinical presentations of acrylate sensitivity and emphasizes the importance of promptly detecting the allergen to prevent further exposure. Awareness of airborne allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates is useful in occupational disease reviews. Additionally, efforts should be made to minimize airborne methacrylate concentrations to reduce sensitization risk.

New device, 'old' allergens. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the Dexcom G7 glucose sensor

Further Evidence of Severe Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Isobornyl Acrylate While Using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors and insulin pumps: A full review

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in the Enlite glucose sensor and the Paradigm MiniMed Quick‐set insulin infusion set

Contact Allergy to Allergens in the Swedish Baseline Series Overrepresented in Diabetes Patients with Skin Reactions to Medical Devices – A Retrospective Study from Southern Sweden

Contact Dermatitis to Diabetes Medical Devices

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in OmniPod, an innovative tubeless insulin pump

Isocyanates may contribute to allergic contact dermatitis from diabetes devices and wound dressings

Relationships Between Acrylamide and Glycidamide Hemoglobin Adduct Levels and Allergy-Related Outcomes in General Us Population, Nhanes 2005-2006

Prevalence of dermatitis including allergic contact dermatitis from medical devices used by children and adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and questionnaire study

2‐Cyanoethyl dimethyldithiocarbamate, a new contact allergen found in accelerator‐free nitrile gloves

CD03 Watch out! Allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates in a smart watch

In vitro characterisation of a novel rubber contact allergen in protective gloves

Sensitisation to the acrylate co‐polymers glyceryl acrylate/acrylic acid co‐polymer, sodium polyacrylate and acrylates/C10‐30 alkyl acrylate cross‐polymer (Carbopol®) is rare

Allergic contact dermatitis due to 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in ostomy patients

CD08 ‘If it’s not the hair maybe it’s in the air?’ A case of allergic contact dermatitis from airborne exposure to acrylates

Perivascular clusters of Th2 cells and M2 macrophages in allergic contact dermatitis to methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone

Contact Dermatitis in a Child from Methlychloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone in Moist Wipes

Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Psoriasis Patients: Typical, Delayed, and Non-Interacting.

British Society for Cutaneous AllergyOral presentationsCD01 Isobornyl acrylate in nail cosmetics

Trends in contact sensitization, results, and implications from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel