Risk and prosocial behavioural cues elicit human-like response patterns from AI chatbots

Yukun Zhao,Zhen Huang,Martin Seligman,Kaiping Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55949-y

IF: 4.6

2024-03-28

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Emotions, long deemed a distinctly human characteristic, guide a repertoire of behaviors, e.g., promoting risk-aversion under negative emotional states or generosity under positive ones. The question of whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) can possess emotions remains elusive, chiefly due to the absence of an operationalized consensus on what constitutes 'emotion' within AI. Adopting a pragmatic approach, this study investigated the response patterns of AI chatbots—specifically, large language models (LLMs)—to various emotional primes. We engaged AI chatbots as one would human participants, presenting scenarios designed to elicit positive, negative, or neutral emotional states. Multiple accounts of OpenAI's ChatGPT Plus were then tasked with responding to inquiries concerning investment decisions and prosocial behaviors. Our analysis revealed that ChatGPT-4 bots, when primed with positive, negative, or neutral emotions, exhibited distinct response patterns in both risk-taking and prosocial decisions, a phenomenon less evident in the ChatGPT-3.5 iterations. This observation suggests an enhanced capacity for modulating responses based on emotional cues in more advanced LLMs. While these findings do not suggest the presence of emotions in AI, they underline the feasibility of swaying AI responses by leveraging emotional indicators.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the question of whether AI chatbots can adjust their behavioral responses to emotional cues in a manner similar to humans. Specifically, the study focuses on the response patterns of large language models (such as ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5) under different emotional prompts. The researchers designed a series of experiments to test these models' performance in risk decision-making and prosocial behavior, comparing it to human behavior.

The main research questions include:
1. Do AI chatbots exhibit lower risk preferences under negative emotional prompts and higher risk preferences under positive emotional prompts?
2. Do AI chatbots exhibit lower prosocial behavior under negative emotional prompts and higher prosocial behavior under positive emotional prompts?
3. Do more advanced AI models (such as ChatGPT-4) show more significant responses to emotional prompts compared to earlier models (such as ChatGPT-3.5)?

The research results indicate that ChatGPT-4's response patterns to emotional prompts are more similar to human behavior, whereas ChatGPT-3.5's responses are less pronounced. This finding helps to understand AI's capability in handling emotional information and its potential applications.