Abstract:The bulk mixed MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O catalysts containing nanoscale intergrowths of so-called M1 and M2 phases display uniquely high reactivity in propane ammoxidation to acrylonitrile associated with the surface ab planes of the M1 phase. The current controversy surrounding this catalytic system is focused on the role of the M2 phase, which is unable to activate propane but was suggested in some studies to function in synergy with the M1 phase by efficiently converting the propylene intermediate to acrylonitrile. The present study systematically examined the catalytic behavior of pure M1 phases prepared by selective dissolution of the M2 phase in MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O catalysts in aqueous hydrogen peroxide. It confirmed that the MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O M1 phases are highly active and selective for propane and propylene ammoxidation, while the MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O M2 phases were active and selective in propylene ammoxidation only. Most importantly, the kinetic study of the MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O M1 and M2 phases in propylene ammoxidation revealed for the very first time that that the M2 phases are significantly less active than the M1 phase in propylene ammoxidation. The findings of this study do not support the existence of the synergy effect for any M1/M2 compositional variant. Instead, the observed behavior of MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O catalysts was consistent with partial loss of some surface active species from the M1 phase surface during the H2O2 treatment and generation of fresh ab planes of the M1 phase via mechanical grinding of the H2O2-treated M1 phase. These findings provided further evidence that the M1 phase is the only phase required for the activity and selectivity of the MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O catalysts in propane ammoxidation to ACN.

Propene ammoxidation over an industrial bismuth molybdate-based catalyst using forced dynamic operation

PROPYLENE AMMOXIDATION UNDER FORCED PERIODIC OSCILLATIONS OF OXYGEN CONCENTRATION

Epoxidation of propylene to propylene oxide catalyzed by μ-oxo-bismetalloporphyrins

Ammoxidation of Propylene to Acrylonitrile in a Bench-Scale Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor

Direct Oxidation Of Propane To Acrolein Over Bimo Based Catalysts

In Situ Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy of Selective Ammoxidation of Propylene over Multi-component Bismuth Molybdate Catalysts

Study on Dynamic Model and Optimization of Propylene Ammoxidation under the Forced Periodic Oscillations of Oxygen Concentration

Self-evolved BOx Anchored on Mg2B2O5 Crystallites for High-Performance Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane

Concerted oxygen diffusion across heterogeneous oxide interfaces for intensified propane dehydrogenation

From microkinetic model to process: understanding the role of the boron nitride surface and gas phase chemistry in the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane

Enabling Direct Oxidation of Ethane to Acetaldehyde with Oxygen using Supported PdO Nanoparticles

Combining CO2 Reduction with Propane Oxidative Dehydrogenation over Bimetallic Catalysts

Direct Oxidation Of Propane To Acrylic Acid Over Movte(Sb)Nbo Mixed Metal Oxide Catalysts

Influences of addition agents of the catalysts for propane ammoxidation to acrylonitrile

Propene Epoxidation with Molecular Oxygen: Advancements from Nanoparticle to Single‐atom Catalysts

A study of M1/M2 phase cooperation in the MoV(Te,Sb)(Nb,Ta)O catalysts for propane ammoxidation to acrylonitrile

Mechanochemically-derived iron atoms on defective boron nitride for stable propylene production

Coupling acid catalysis and selective oxidation over MoO3-Fe2O3 for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane

Experimental Study of Partially Decoupled Oxidation of Ethane for Producing Ethylene and Acetylene

Catalyzing Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane over Carbon Nanofiber Supported Phosphoric Oxides Catalysts

Enhancing the Acetylene Yield from Methane by Decoupling Oxidation and Pyrolysis Reactions: A Comparison with the Partial Oxidation Process