Abstract:Diversity plays an important role in various domains, including conservation, whether it describes diversity within a population or diversity over a set of species. While various strategies for measuring among-species diversity have emerged (e.g. Phylogenetic Diversity (PD), Split System Diversity (SSD) and entropy-based methods), extensions to populations are rare. An understudied problem is how to assess the diversity of a collection of populations where each has its own internal diversity. Relying solely on measures that treat each population as a monomorphic lineage (like a species) can be misleading. To address this problem, we present four population-level diversity assessment approaches: Pooling, Averaging, Pairwise Differencing, and Fixing. These approaches can be used to extend any diversity measure that is primarily defined for a group of individuals to a collection of populations. We then apply the approaches to two measures of diversity that have been used in conservation—Heterozygosity (Het) and Split System Diversity (SSD)—across a dataset comprising SNP data for 50 anadromous Atlantic salmon populations. We investigate agreement and disagreement between these measures of diversity when used to identify optimal sets of populations for conservation, on both the observed data, and randomized and simulated datasets. The similarity and differences of the maximum-diversity sets as well as the pairwise correlations among our proposed measures emphasize the need to clearly define what aspects of biodiversity we aim to both measure and optimize, to ensure meaningful and effective conservation decisions. Measuring diversity has several implications including conservation prioritization. However, accurately assessing genetic diversity across multiple populations while considering both within and among population variations is often overlooked. Our study addresses this gap by introducing four novel methods, allowing a better understanding of measuring diversity across populations from different perspectives. We applied these methods to simulated data and data from Atlantic salmon populations. The results sometimes disagree on which populations are most important for conservation, highlighting the need for clear biodiversity goals in conservation decisions. It's important to note that there isn't a single correct answer to the question of how to measure diversity, and the best approach is likely to depend on the conservation priorities and criteria under consideration. By understanding the reason behind these differences, we can make more informed choices to protect our natural world. This research contributes to a broader understanding of diversity and can help guide areas where measuring diversity is important.

Genetic Diversity and the Survival of Populations

A comprehensive representation of selection at loci with multiple alleles that allows complex forms of genotypic fitness

Demography and environment modulate the effects of genetic diversity on extinction risk in a butterfly metapopulation

Measuring genetic diversity across populations

Genetic and Habitat Rescue Improve Population Viability in Self‐Incompatible Plants

Linking the spatial and genomic structure of adaptive potential for conservation management: a review

Adaptation to a changing environment: what me Normal?

Life history, climate and biogeography interactively affect worldwide genetic diversity of plant and animal populations

A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations

Effects of Genetic Drift and Gene Flow on the Selective Maintenance of Genetic Variation

Genetic Diversity and the Efficacy of Purifying Selection across Plant and Animal Species

Genetic Diversity on the Sex Chromosomes

The Effects of Mutation and Recombination Rate Heterogeneity on the Inference of Demography and the Distribution of Fitness Effects

Genetic rescue often leads to higher fitness as a result of increased heterozygosity across animal taxa

The Diversity Paradox: How Nature Resolves an Evolutionary Dilemma

When do factors promoting balanced selection also promote population persistence? A demographic perspective on Gillespie's SAS-CFF model

Relative vs absolute fitness in a population genetics model. How stronger selection may promote genetic diversity

Effects of genetic distance on heterosis in a Drosophila melanogaster model system

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics

Eco‐evolutionary extinction and recolonization dynamics reduce genetic load and increase time to extinction in highly inbred populations

Sexual selection matters in genetic rescue, but productivity benefits fade over time; a multi-generation experiment to inform conservation.