Abstract:Abstract Reconstructing the spatial evolution of languages can deepen our understanding of the demic diffusion and cultural spread. However, the phylogeographic approach that is frequently used to infer language dispersal patterns has limitations, primarily because the phylogenetic tree cannot fully explain the language evolution induced by the horizontal contact among languages, such as borrowing and areal diffusion. Here, we introduce the language velocity field estimation, which does not rely on the phylogenetic tree, to infer language dispersal trajectories and centre. Its effectiveness and robustness are verified through both simulated and empirical validations. Using language velocity field estimation, we infer the dispersal patterns of four agricultural language families and groups, encompassing approximately 700 language samples. Our results show that the dispersal trajectories of these languages are primarily compatible with population movement routes inferred from ancient DNA and archaeological materials, and their dispersal centres are geographically proximate to ancient homelands of agricultural or Neolithic cultures. Our findings highlight that the agricultural languages dispersed alongside the demic diffusions and cultural spreads during the past 10,000 years. We expect that language velocity field estimation could aid the spatial analysis of language evolution and further branch out into the studies of demographic and cultural dynamics.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve several key problems in the reconstruction of language diffusion patterns, especially the limitations encountered when using the traditional phylogeographic approach. Specifically: 1. **Limitations of traditional methods**: - The phylogeographic approach mainly relies on constructing the phylogenetic tree of languages. Although this method can well represent the vertical evolutionary relationships between languages (such as branching and differentiation), it cannot fully explain language evolution caused by horizontal contact, such as language borrowing and regional diffusion. - These limitations lead to an incomplete understanding of the spatial evolution of languages, especially when it comes to complex interactions in multilingual regions. 2. **Proposed new method**: - The paper introduces a new computational method - **Language Velocity Field Estimation (LVF)**. This method does not rely on the phylogenetic tree but infers language diffusion trajectories and centers by establishing a velocity field. - The velocity field can capture the diachronic evolution trajectories of language features and also reflect the influence of horizontal contact, thus more comprehensively describing the spatio - temporal evolution of languages. 3. **Verification and application**: - The researchers verified the effectiveness and robustness of LVF through simulated data sets and empirical data. - In empirical applications, LVF was used to infer the diffusion patterns of four agricultural language families (Indo - European, Sino - Tibetan, Bantu, and Arawak) and explored the interdisciplinary consistency between these language diffusions and ancient population migrations and cultural diffusions. 4. **Research significance**: - This method helps to deepen our understanding of human population migrations and cultural diffusions in the past 10,000 years, especially how agricultural languages spread along with population migrations and cultural diffusions. - LVF provides a new tool that can further analyze language evolution and its historical connection with human activities, providing strong support for interdisciplinary research. Through these efforts, the paper hopes to provide a more comprehensive and accurate method for the study of language spatial evolution, so as to better understand the complex interactions between languages, cultures, and populations.

Inferring language dispersal patterns with velocity field estimation

Phylogenetic evidence reveals early Kra-Dai divergence and dispersal in the late Holocene

Cultural versus demic diffusion in agricultural expansions according to three definitions of dispersal distances

Modeling the velocity of evolving lineages and predicting dispersal patterns

Language dynamics model with finite-range interactions influencing the diffusion of linguistic traits and human dispersal

Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages

Triangulation fails when neither linguistic, genetic, nor archaeological data support the Transeurasian narrative

Correlation Between Genetic Structure and Linguistic Phylogeny in East Asia

Accommodating sampling location uncertainty in continuous phylogeography

The Quantitative Analysis of Language Spread Pattern of Southern Min Dialects

Adaptively Exploring Population Mobility Patterns in Flow Visualization

Linguistic evolution driven by network heterogeneity and the Turing mechanism

Large-scale lexical and genetic alignment supports a hybrid model of Han Chinese demic and cultural diffusions

Phonemic evidence reveals interwoven evolution of Chinese dialects

The Origin and Dispersal of Austroasiatic Languages from the Perspectives of Linguistics, Archeology, and Genetics

Estimating dispersal rates and locating genetic ancestors with genome-wide genealogies

Language Distribution Prediction based on Batch Markov Monte Carlo Simulation with Migration

How fast are viruses spreading in the wild?

Using genetic data to estimate diffusion rates in heterogeneous landscapes

Influence of geography on language competition