Quantifying doula association with maternal and neonatal outcomes
Lara S Lemon,Beth Quinn,Melissa Young,Hannah Keith,Amy Ruscetti,Hyagriv N Simhan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.029
2024-08-24
Abstract:Background: The US suffers from an increasing rate of severe maternal morbidity, paired with a wide disparity in maternal health by race. Doulas are posited to be a useful resource to increase positive outcomes and decrease this disparity. Objective: Evaluate the association of doula care with a broad range of maternal and neonatal outcomes in various subpopulations. Study design: Retrospective cohort of deliveries from 1/2021-12/2022 at a single institution receiving prenatal care. Exposure was receipt of doula care prenatally and at delivery. We evaluated both maternal (cesarean delivery, cesarean delivery of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex infant, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum emergency department visit, readmission and attendance at postpartum office visit) and neonatal (neonatal intensive care unit admission, unexpected complications in term newborns, breastfeeding, preterm delivery, and intrauterine fetal growth restriction) outcomes. Because our institution previously employed targeted outreach, offering doula services to patients at highest risk, we utilized multiple methods to generate an appropriate comparison population. We conducted multivariate logistic regression and conditional regressions using propensity scores, modeling likelihood of doula care, to generate adjusted risk differences associated with doula care. Analyses were repeated in populations stratified by race (White/Black) then payor status (public/commercial). Results: Our cohort included 17,831 deliveries; 486 with doula care and 17,345 without. Patients receiving doula care were more likely to self-report Black race, be publicly insured, and live in a more disadvantaged neighborhood. Regardless of analytic approach, for every 100 patients under doula care there were 15-34 more VBACs [adjRD 15.6 (95%CI: 3.8, 27.4); adjRD 34.2 (95%CI: 0.046, 68.0)] and 5-6 more patients attending a postpartum office visit [adjRD 5.4 (95%CI: 1.4, 9.5); adjRD 6.8 (95% CI:3.7, 9.9)] compared with those not receiving doula services. Infants born to these patients were 20% more like likely to be exclusively breastfed [adjRR 1.22 (95%CI: 1.07, 1.38)], and doula care was associated with 3-4 fewer preterm births [adjRD -3.8 (95%CI: -6.1, -1.5); -4.0 (95%CI: -6.2, -1.8)] for every 100 deliveries receiving doula care. Results were consistent regardless of race or insurance. Results were also consistent when doula care was redefined as having at least 3 prenatal encounters with a doula. Conclusions: Doula care was associated with more VBACs, attendance at postpartum office visit, breastfeeding, and fewer preterm deliveries. The effect of doula care was consistent across race and insurance status.