The application of machine learning techniques in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jing Wang,Hui Ouyang,Runda Jiao,Suhui Cheng,Haiyan Zhang,Zhilei Shang,Yanpu Jia,Wenjie Yan,Lili Wu,Weizhi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01117-5
IF: 15.2
2024-05-10
npj Digital Medicine
Abstract:Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recently becomes one of the most important mental health concerns. However, no previous study has comprehensively reviewed the application of big data and machine learning (ML) techniques in PTSD. We found 873 studies meet the inclusion criteria and a total of 31 of those in a sample of 210,001 were included in quantitative analysis. ML algorithms were able to discriminate PTSD with an overall accuracy of 0.89. Pooled estimates of classification accuracy from multi-dimensional data (0.96) are higher than single data types (0.86 to 0.90). ML techniques can effectively classify PTSD and models using multi-dimensional data perform better than those using single data types. While selecting optimal combinations of data types and ML algorithms to be clinically applied at the individual level still remains a big challenge, these findings provide insights into the classification, identification, diagnosis and treatment of PTSD.
health care sciences & services,medical informatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and summarize the application effects of machine learning (ML) techniques in post - traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), especially the performance of these techniques in classifying, identifying, diagnosing, and treating PTSD. Specifically, the research aims to answer the following key questions: 1. **The current application status of ML techniques in PTSD**: Through systematic review and meta - analysis, evaluate the application of ML techniques in the field of PTSD in the existing literature. 2. **The classification accuracy of ML techniques**: Analyze the accuracy of PTSD classification for different data types (such as neuroimaging, scales, texts, biomedicine, etc.), and compare the performance differences between single data types and multi - dimensional data types. 3. **The selection of the best combination**: Explore how to select the optimal combination of data types and ML algorithms to achieve clinical applications at the individual level. 4. **The advantages and limitations of ML techniques in PTSD research**: Reveal the advantages of ML techniques in PTSD research, and at the same time point out their limitations and directions for future improvement. ### Research Background PTSD is a psychological disorder caused by exposure to or witnessing extremely threatening or catastrophic traumatic events. The main symptoms include intrusive experiences, continuous avoidance of stimuli, negative changes in cognition and emotion, and significant arousal and reactivity changes related to the traumatic event. Research shows that more than 70% of adults will experience at least one traumatic event at some point in their lives, and the lifetime prevalence of PTSD is approximately 5% - 10%. Although a large number of studies have focused on the impact of PTSD, effective intervention at the individual level still faces challenges. ### Application of ML Techniques Traditional PTSD research methods usually adopt a top - down approach, that is, first propose a hypothesis, design an experiment, collect data, and finally decide to accept or reject the hypothesis. ML techniques, on the other hand, can provide a bottom - up research method. By analyzing multi - dimensional data (such as texts, scales, brain images, behaviors, and physiological indicators), hidden information can be discovered, common features can be extracted, and complex causal relationships can be revealed. ### Main Findings - **Overall classification accuracy**: The overall accuracy rate of ML algorithms in distinguishing PTSD patients from non - PTSD individuals is 0.89 (95% confidence interval is [0.88, 0.91]). - **Multi - dimensional data is superior to single data types**: The classification accuracy of ML models using multi - dimensional data is the highest (0.96 [0.93, 1.00]), which is higher than the classification accuracy of single data types (0.86 [0.82, 0.90] to 0.90 [0.84, 0.96]). - **Heterogeneity and publication bias**: There is significant heterogeneity among studies, which may be due to factors such as data types, sample selection difficulties, and applicable ML algorithms. In addition, the funnel plot shows the existence of publication bias, which may be due to researchers' tendency to report well - performing models and their accuracy indicators. ### Conclusion This study quantitatively proves the effectiveness of ML techniques in the field of PTSD through systematic review and meta - analysis, and provides AI - enabled evidence and ideas for PTSD screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Although ML techniques show great potential in PTSD research, their optimal application at the individual level still needs further exploration and optimization.