Stability and complexity in model ecosystems: monographs in population biology

Robert M May

1974-01-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Complexity and stability in model ecosystems

Robert M May

1973-01-01

Abstract:
1973Stability and complexity in model ecosystems

Robert M May

Abstract:
Stability and complexity in model ecosystems

Robert M May

2019-12-31

Abstract:What makes populations stabilize? What makes them fluctuate? Are populations in complex ecosystems more stable than populations in simple ecosystems? In 1973, Robert May addressed these questions in this classic book. May investigated the mathematical roots of population dynamics and argued-counter to most current biological thinking-that complex ecosystems in themselves do not lead to population stability. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems played a key role in introducing nonlinear mathematical models and the study of deterministic chaos into ecology, a role chronicled in James Gleick's book Chaos. In the quarter century since its first publication, the book's message has grown in power. Nonlinear models are now at the center of ecological thinking, and current threats to biodiversity have made questions about the role of ecosystem complexity more crucial than ever. In a new introduction, the author addresses some of the changes that have swept biology and the biological world since the book's first publication.
Stability in model ecosystems

Robert M May

1971-01-01

Abstract:This paper surveys an assortment of theoretical models, all bearing on the question of population stability in multi-species communities. Overall, the review is directed at the field and laboratory ecologist, and aims to be interpretive and non-mathematical. The main conclusion, derived from several independent lines of argument, is that, in general multi-species mathematical models, increased complexity tends to diminish rather than enhance stability. Although stability and complexity may go together in the real world, such stability must be the result of quite special strategies, and is not a mathematical consequence of complexity per se. Various minor points are also raised, among them being: the occurrence of stable" limit cycle" oscillations; the role played by timedelays in feedback mechanisms, and the way that addition of extra trophic levels can stabilise them; the relation between stability within one trophic level and total web stability; why strong predator-prey links are liable to be more common in Nature than strong symbiotic links.
Stability in multispecies community models

Robert M May

1971-10-01

Abstract:
Qualitative stability in model ecosystems

Robert M May

1973-05-01

Abstract:We discuss deductions that can be made as to the stability of multispecies communities, knowing only the structure of the food web, i.e., knowing only the signs of the elements in the interation matrix. Systems which are stable in these circumstances are called qualitatively stable and have been treated in economic and other contexts. The discussion touches upon general aspects of the relation between complexity and stability in multispecies systems, and in particular suggests that on stability grounds predator—prey bonds should be more common than mutualistic ones. This result is not intuitively obvious, but is a feature of many real—world ecosystems.
The structure and dynamics of ecological communities

Robert M May

1979-01-01

Abstract:This concluding chapter is divided into two distinct parts. The first part is a brief review of what I conceive to be some of the main themes that have emerged recently from theoretical and empirical studies of the dynamics of single populations. These themes have been sounded in many of the earlier chapters in this book, and they serve to draw together a large and diverse amount of information about the way real populations behave in the laboratory and in the field. Much of this work, at the level of single populations, has the satisfying property of putting theoretical curves through, or at least near, collections of data points.In contrast, the second part is almost wholly speculative. Here mathematical models are used to explore questions about the way multispecies systems are organized. The models are necessarily greatly oversimplified, and at best bear a metaphorical relation to real ecosystems. This second part begins with a review of the various studies suggesting that, as a mathematical generality, increasing complexity (more species, a richer web of interactions) leads to diminishing dynamical stability (less ability to withstand, or recover from, disturbances). It goes on to review several mechanisms whereby the structure of real ecosystems may reconcile special kinds of complexity with dynamical stability.
Stability Criteria for Complex Ecosystems

Stefano Allesina,Si Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10832

2011-05-11

Abstract:Forty years ago, Robert May questioned a central belief in ecology by proving that sufficiently large or complex ecological networks have probability of persisting close to zero. To prove this point, he analyzed large networks in which species interact at random. However, in natural systems pairs of species have well-defined interactions (e.g., predator-prey, mutualistic or competitive). Here we extend May's results to these relationships and find remarkable differences between predator-prey interactions, which increase stability, and mutualistic and competitive, which are destabilizing. We provide analytic stability criteria for all cases. These results have broad applicability in ecology. For example, we show that, surprisingly, the probability of stability for predator-prey networks is decreased when we impose realistic food web structure or we introduce a large preponderance of weak interactions. Similarly, stability is negatively impacted by nestedness in bipartite mutualistic networks.

Populations and Evolution
Stability in ecosystems: some comments

Robert M May

1975-05-01

Abstract:The variety of meanings that can be attached to’ stability’ in ecological contexts has been discussed by Lewontin (1969), Holling (1973), May (1973) and others. Orians (1975) has opened this section with an insightful review of this material.
Complexity-stability relationships in disordered dynamical systems

Onofrio Mazzarisi,Matteo Smerlak

2024-06-26

Abstract:Robert May famously used random matrix theory to predict that large, complex systems cannot admit stable fixed points. However, this general conclusion is not always supported by empirical observation: from cells to biomes, biological systems are large, complex and, often, stable. In this paper, we revisit May's argument in light of recent developments in both ecology and random matrix theory. Using a non-linear generalization of the competitive Lotka-Volterra model, we show that there are, in fact, two kinds of complexity-stability relationships in disordered dynamical systems: if self-interactions grow faster with density than cross-interactions, complexity is destabilizing; but if cross-interactions grow faster than self-interactions, complexity is stabilizing.

Statistical Mechanics,Disordered Systems and Neural Networks,Populations and Evolution
Nonlinear problems in ecology and resource management

Robert M May

1983-01-01

Abstract:
Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states

Robert M May

1977-10-06

Abstract:Theory and observation indicate that natural multi-species assemblies of plants and animals are likely to possess several different equilibrium points. This review discusses how alternate stable states can arise in simple 1- and 2-species systems, and applies these ideas to grazing systems, to insect pests, and to some human host–parasite systems.
A taxonomy of multiple stable states in complex ecological communities

Guim Aguadé‐Gorgorió,Jean‐François Arnoldi,Matthieu Barbier,Sonia Kéfi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14413

IF: 11.274

2024-04-10

Ecology Letters

Abstract:We often use simple models to talk about regime shifts and alternative stable states in nature. But how does multistability really look like in complex systems? We find that high‐dimensional models with random interactions can unfold up to four different multistability regimes. More importantly, each regime shows the same fingerprints across biological systems, suggesting a general taxonomy. Natural systems are built from multiple interconnected units, making their dynamics, functioning and fragility notoriously hard to predict. A fragility scenario of particular relevance concerns so‐called regime shifts: abrupt transitions from healthy to degraded ecosystem states. An explanation for these shifts is that they arise as transitions between alternative stable states, a process that is well‐understood in few‐species models. However, how multistability upscales with system complexity remains a debated question. Here, we identify that four different multistability regimes generically emerge in models of species‐rich communities and other archetypical complex biological systems assuming random interactions. Across the studied models, each regime consistently emerges under a specific interaction scheme and leaves a distinct set of fingerprints in terms of the number of observed states, their species richness and their response to perturbations. Our results help clarify the conditions and types of multistability that can be expected to occur in complex ecological communities.

ecology
Ecological Non-Monotonicity and Its Effects on Complexity and Stability of Populations, Communities and Ecosystems

Zhibin Zhang,Chuan Yan,Charles J. Krebs,Nils Chr. Stenseth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.004

IF: 3.1

2015-01-01

Ecological Modelling

Abstract:In traditional ecological models, the effects of abiotic and biotic factors are often assumed to be monotonic, i.e. either positive, negative or neutral. However, there has been growing evidence that non-monotonic effects of environmental factors and both intra- and inter-specific interactions can significantly influence the dynamics and stability of populations, communities and ecosystems. In this paper, we present a review and synthesis on both theoretical and empirical studies on ecological non-monotonicity. There are various non-monotonic relations observed in populations, communities and ecosystems. The non-monotonic function of per capita population increase rate against intrinsic or extrinsic factors is a significant driving force in determining the complexity and stability of biological systems. There are several mechanisms such as the law of tolerance, adaptive behaviors, or opposing dual or pathway effects which may result in non-monotonic functions. Ecological non-monotonic functions are often closely related to spatial and temporal scale processes which may explain why ecosystems are often highly variable and unpredictable in both space and time. Recognizing ecological non-monotonicity would greatly change our conventional monotonic views on the effects of environmental factors and species interactions on ecosystems. We appeal for more effort to study ecological non-monotonicity and re-think our strategies to manage ecosystems under accelerated global change.
Models for single populations

Robert M May

1976-01-01

Abstract:
On relationships among various types of population models

Robert M May

1973-01-01

Abstract:Mathematical models for communities of interacting species usually seek to relate the population growth rates to the various inter- and intraspecific interactions. If birth is a continuous process, so that the populations grow in a continuous manner, one ends up with a system of differential equations; conversely, if generations are discrete, so that population growth is a discrete process, the result is a system of difference equations. Corresponding to any particular differential equation system is an analogous difference equation system, which embodies identical biological assumptions except that time is a discrete rather than a continuous variable. I make explicit the relation between the stability properties of any such pair of models, showing in precisely what sense the populations in the difference equation system tend to be less stable than those in the differential equation model. Although this point is basically a …
Time‐delay versus stability in population models with two and three trophic levels

Robert M May

1973-03-01

Abstract:If a biological or other system has a potentially stabilizing negative feedback mechanism, which, however, is applied with a time lag long compared to the natural time scale of the system, the result is instability, not stability. This theme is developed in detail for vegetation—herbivore and vegetation—herbivore—carnivore systems in which the stabilizing resource—limitation effect operates on the herbivore population with a time lag. Under certain conditions, which are commonly met in nature, the vegetation—herbivore—carnivore system is stable (with population fluctuations being damped out), while the vegetation—herbivore system with no predators is unstable. This model, which can be supported with some observational data, suggests inter alia that herbivore population numbers may often be set neither by predators alone nor by vegetation alone, but by an explicit interplay between both effects.
Dispersal-induced instability in complex ecosystems

Joseph W. Baron,Tobias Galla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19824-4

2020-03-09

Abstract:In his seminal work in the 1970s Robert May suggested that there was an upper limit to the number of species that could be sustained in stable equilibrium by an ecosystem. This deduction was at odds with both intuition and the observed complexity of many natural ecosystems. The so-called stability-diversity debate ensued, and the discussion about the factors making an ecosystem stable or unstable continues to this day. We show in this work that dispersal can be a destabilising influence. To do this, we combine ideas from Alan Turing's work on pattern formation with May's random-matrix approach. We demonstrate how a stable equilibrium in a complex ecosystem with two trophic levels can become unstable with the introduction of dispersal in space. Conversely, we show that Turing instabilities can occur more easily in complex ecosystems with many species than in the case of only a few species. Our work shows that adding more details to the model of May gives rise to more ways in which an equilibrium can become unstable. Making May's simple model more realistic is therefore unlikely to remove the upper bound on complexity.

Populations and Evolution,Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
Mathematical aspects of the dynamics of animal populations

Robert M May

1978-03-01

Abstract:
Chaos and the dynamics of biological populations

Robert Mccredie May

1987-09-08

Abstract:As first emphasized in the early 1970s, the nonlinearities that are inherent in simple models for the regulation of plant and animal populations can lead to chaotic dynamics. This review deals with a variety of instances where chaotic phenomena can arise, particularly in interactions between prey and predators (including hosts and pathogens, hosts and parasitic insects, and harvested populations). Some of the complications in disentangling deterministic chaos from environmental noise will be discussed. The combination of population biology with population genetics leads to an even richer assortment of nonlinear phenomena and to the suggestion that many genetic polymorphisms may vary cyclically or chaotically (rather than being steady, as usually is assumed implicitly). I argue that complex dynamics - including chaos - is likely to be pervasive in population biology and population genetics, even in seemingly …

Stability and complexity in model ecosystems: monographs in population biology

Complexity and stability in model ecosystems

1973Stability and complexity in model ecosystems

Stability and complexity in model ecosystems

Stability in model ecosystems

Stability in multispecies community models

Qualitative stability in model ecosystems

The structure and dynamics of ecological communities

Stability Criteria for Complex Ecosystems

Stability in ecosystems: some comments

Complexity-stability relationships in disordered dynamical systems

Nonlinear problems in ecology and resource management

Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states

A taxonomy of multiple stable states in complex ecological communities

Ecological Non-Monotonicity and Its Effects on Complexity and Stability of Populations, Communities and Ecosystems

Models for single populations

On relationships among various types of population models

Time‐delay versus stability in population models with two and three trophic levels

Dispersal-induced instability in complex ecosystems

Mathematical aspects of the dynamics of animal populations

Chaos and the dynamics of biological populations