Qualitative and Quantitative Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Basal and Dentoalveolar Dimensions in Patients with and Without Maxillary Impacted Canines
Hasan M. Sharhan,Abeer A. Almashraqi,Hanan Al-fakeh,Najah Alhashimi,Ehab A. Abdulghani,Wenyuanfeng Chen,Abeer A. Al-Sosowa,BaoCheng Cao,Maged S. Alhammadi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00434-3
IF: 3.247
2022-01-01
Progress in Orthodontics
Abstract:Background This study aimed to three-dimensionally evaluate the qualitative and quantitative maxillary basal, dentoalveolar, and dental dimensions in patients with unilateral or bilateral maxillary impacted canines relative to their normal peers. Materials and methods This is a retrospective comparative study. Cone-beam computed tomography images of one hundred and fifty adult patients were divided into three equal groups: unilateral, bilateral, and control groups. Each had 50 patients that were three-dimensionally analysed. The quantitative measurements involved three basal (molar basal width, premolar basal width, and arch depth), seven dentoalveolar (molar alveolar width, premolar alveolar width, inter-molar width, inter-premolar width, inter-canine width, arch length, and arch perimeter), and two dental (canine length and width) measurements. The qualitative measurements included four bone density areas (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) around the maxillary impacted canines. Result Differences between the three groups were statistically different for the quantitative measurements involving the two basal variables (molar basal width and premolar basal width) and all measured dentoalveolar variables; these were smaller in the unilateral and bilateral groups compared with the control group ( p < 0.001). Unilateral and bilateral impacted canine groups showed significantly wider and shorter canines than the control group ( p < 0.001). The qualitative measurements (the four bone density areas) around unilateral and bilateral impacted canine groups showed significantly greater density than the control group ( p < 0.001). There was no significant qualitative or quantitative difference between the unilateral and bilateral impacted canines. The three groups had no significant variations in terms of arch depth. Conclusion Maxillary unilateral and bilateral canine impactions are associated with reduced basal and dentoalveolar dimensions as well as wider and shorter maxillary canines compared to normal peers. The quality of bone around unilateral and bilateral impacted maxillary canines is higher than in non-impacted cases. Unilateral and bilateral canine impactions have quite similar qualitative and quantitative parameters.