Unraveling the impact of social determinants of health on HER2+ early breast cancer screening and treatment in a county oncology setting in China.
Yinghua Ji,Feidu Zhou,Honglan Qu,Qianfu Wu,Wei Liang,Mengyou Liu,Juan Wang,Jun Luo,Xiang Tan,Guohua Dai,Guinv Hu,Qiuli Meng,Wenbo He,Hongjian Wang,Zien Qin,Guoxiang Luo,Huali Tang,Yun Ren,Hui Liu,Yinguo Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e13677
IF: 45.3
2024-05-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e13677 Background: HER2 positive breast cancer (BC) accounts for 15-20% of all BC cases. Various barriers, including social, demographic, and economic factors, may hinder BC screening and treatment. We examined the barriers to screening and treatment for patients (pts) with HER2 positive early BC (eBC) in a county setting in China. Methods: This analysis investigated patient profiles, treatment patterns, and social determinants of health (SDOH) indicators among newly diagnosed pts with HER2+ eBC from in 26 hospitals in a real-world county setting. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate logistic regression analysis (MVA) were performed to explore the association between SDOH and treatment. Results: 878 pts with HER+ eBC were identified, with a median age of 53 years. 12.8% received BC screening, 18.5% received neo-adjuvant targeted therapy (NATT), 9.9% received breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 23.5% received radiotherapy (RT); 87.8% received adjuvant targeted therapy (ATT), and 52.5% received dual-targeted therapy. The UVA and MVA found differences in treatment patterns associated with age, employment, education level, insurance type, and regions. Pts in the central China regions had a higher likelihood of receiving BC screening. Pts who received NATT were more likely to be located in the western. Younger pts and those in the north-eastern areas were primarily likely to receive BCS. RT was relatively common among pts with a higher-level education, employee medical insurance, and residents in the north-eastern. Pts from eastern regions were more likely to receive ATT, while younger pts were more likely to receive dual-targeted therapy. Conclusions: In the county oncology setting, we observed inequities in screening and treatment based on social determinants analyzed. Promoting standardization of BC screening and treatment should take the sociodemographic disparities into consideration. To address these disparities, it is necessary to raise public awareness, promote high-quality, balanced development and integrate urban-rural areas in compulsory education, allocate more quality medical resources to the county level and ensure their even distribution among regions. [Table: see text]
oncology