Abstract:Background The shape of the forehead is primarily determined by the frontal bone, which holds significance for health and aesthetics. This study evaluated the morphology of the frontal bone in different age groups and genders using computed tomography (CT). Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on CT scan results of 220 patients divided into three age groups: 20–29.27, 29.27–47.54, and 47.54–95 years. The investigation explored the lower and upper angles compared with the Sella–Nasion (SN) line, the maximum frontal projection with Nasion in the SN plan, and the variations in frontal thickness across different angles (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 degrees) relative to the SN plane. All data were analyzed using R software, considering the significance level p < 0.05. Results Of 220 patients, 119 were men, and the mean age of the participants was 41.09 ± 18.06 years. The average upper frontal slope (UFS) angle was 56.96 ± 8.17 degrees, which was 59.35 ± 7.92 degrees in females and 54.94 ± 7.86 degrees in males. The mean lower frontal slope (LFS) angle was 86.30 ± 7.96 degrees, which was 90.71 ± 6.67 degrees in females and 82.55 ± 7.00 degrees in males. The average contour nasion (C–N) distance was 7.51 ± 3.72 mm. Also, the frontal thickness at an angle of 15 degrees had the highest value of 13.08 ± 2.68 mm and at 30 degrees had the lowest value of 5.81 ± 1.56 mm. A significant difference was observed between the UFS and LFS among males and females ( p < 0.001). Across all age groups, men exhibited a steeper angle, indicating a greater posterior inclination than women. Moreover, males with upper ages reported a significant increase in C–N distance and frontal projection ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of considering gender-specific variations in frontal bone structure when planning cosmetic or reconstructive procedures involving the forehead. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran (IR.QUMS.REC.1402.075). All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations that is Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave their informed consent to participate in the study. The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A.H.B, A.N., A.K., and M.T. participated in the research design. A.H.B., F.T-D., and A.N. participated in writing the first draft. A.H.B., M.T., and A.A. participated in the performance of the research and analytic tools. A.H.B., A.A., and A.K. participated in data analysis. All authors reviewed and confirmed the final manuscript. * These authors contributed equally to the article. Article published online: 11 November 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Relationship between forehead motion and the shape of forehead lines—A 3D skin displacement vector analysis

Increasing precision during neuromodulator injections for frontal rhytids—Using ultrasound imaging to identify the line of convergence

An Update on the Anatomy of the Forehead Compartments

Three-dimensional adipofascial and dermal structures involved in forehead crease formation

The efficacy and safety of neubotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of forehead horizontal lines in Asians – A clinical, prospective, interventional, split‐face study

Study of frontal hairline patterns for natural design and restoration

Mapping High-Risk Arteries Using Doppler Ultrasound for Forehead Contouring in Korean Patients

Precise Needle and Cannula Placement in the Forehead During Aesthetic Procedures: Can Device and Angulation Influence Accuracy? A Fresh Frozen Specimen Study

Applied Anatomical Study of Autologous Fat Injection in Forehead Area

Treating Glabellar Lines With Botulinum Toxin: Does Your Patient Need to Frown Steadily?

Classification and Morphological Variation of the Frontalis Muscle and Implications on the Clinical Practice

Singular entry point technique for forehead and temple filler augmentation: Anatomical and clinical perspectives

[The useful forehead, the impaired forehead, but the forehead… repaired!]

One21: A Novel, Customizable Injection Protocol for Treatment of the Forehead with IncobotulinumtoxinA

Evolving Forehead Augmentation: A Five-step Approach with High G Prime Hyaluronic Acid

Optimizing Botulinum Toxin A Administration for Forehead Wrinkles: Introducing the Lines and Dots (LADs) Technique and a Predictive Dosage Model

The Platysma Contraction Pattern in Healthy Adults: A Vector Analysis Study

Frontal Bone Morphology in Different Age and Gender Groups Using Computed Tomography

Full‐face effects of temporal volumizing and temporal lifting techniques

Simulation of Skin Stretching around the Forehead Wrinkles in Rhytidectomy

Simulating Upper Eyelid Ptosis During Neuromodulator Injections—An Exploratory Injection and Dissection Study