Full‐face effects of temporal volumizing and temporal lifting techniques

Gabriela Casabona,Konstantin Frank,Nicholas Moellhoff,Diana L. Gavril,Arthur Swift,David L. Freytag,Antonia Kaiser,Jeremy B. Green,Andreas Nikolis,Sebastian Cotofana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13728
2020-10-05
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Most injection techniques utilizing hyaluronic acid based soft tissue fillers have predictable outcomes at the location injected. However, the temporal region has been identified to have the potential to affect panfacial aesthetic improvements depending on the applied injection technique.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Material and Methods</h3><p>The medical records of 9 female and 5 male Caucasian patients with a mean age of 50.9 ± 11.9 years were retrospectively reviewed for the effects of these techniques: supraperiosteal, interfascial, subdermal. Panfacial effects were evaluated by the semiquantitative assessment of aesthetic scores for the temple volume, the temporal crest visibility, the lateral orbital rim visibility, the position of the eyebrows, the severity of lateral canthal lines, the midfacial volume and by the contour of the jawline.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The supraperiosteal injection technique had the greatest influence on improving the temporal volume (25.0%), the temporal crest (33.3%) and the lateral orbital rim visibility (31.0%) scales but had no effects in other facial regions. The interfascial injection technique revealed good effects on improving temporal hollowing (23.3%) but had an even greater effect on the crow's feet (26.8%) and on the position of the eyebrow (33.3%). The subdermal injection technique had its greatest effects in the lower face by improving the contour of the jawline (26.8%) followed by the improvement of the lower cheek fullness scale (14.3%).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Future injection algorithms could utilize all three injection techniques together as one <i>multi‐layer injection approach</i> with a tailored proportion of each technique based on the aesthetic needs of the patient. </p></section>
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?