Abstract:Phylogenetic studies are increasingly reliant on next‐generation sequencing. Transcriptomic and hybrid enrichment sequencing techniques remain the most prevalent methods for phylogenomic data collection due to their relatively low demands for computing powers and sequencing prices, compared to whole‐genome sequencing (WGS). However, the transcriptome‐based method is constrained by the availability of fresh materials and hybrid enrichment is limited by genomic resources necessary in probe designs, especially for non‐model organisms. We present a novel WGS‐based pipeline for extracting essential phylogenomic markers through rapid de novo genome assembling from low‐coverage genome data, employing a series of computationally efficient bioinformatic tools. We tested the pipeline on a Hexapoda dataset and a more focused Phthiraptera dataset (genome sizes 0.1–2 Gbp), and further investigated the effects of sequencing depth on target assembly success rate based on the raw data of six insect genomes (0.1–1 Gbp). Each genome assembly was completed in 2–24 hr on desktop PCs. We extracted 872–1,615 near‐universal single‐copy orthologs (Benchmarking Universal Single‐Copy Orthologs [BUSCOs]) per species. This method also enables the development of ultraconserved element (UCE) probe sets; we generated probes for Phthiraptera based on our WGS assemblies, containing 55,030 baits targeting 2,832 loci, from which we extracted 2,125–2,272 UCEs. Resulting phylogenetic trees all agreed with the currently accepted topologies, indicating that markers produced in our methods were valid for phylogenomic studies. We also showed that 10–20× sequencing coverage was sufficient to produce hundreds to thousands of targeted loci from BUSCO sets, and an even lower coverage (5×) was required for UCEs. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting phylogenomics from low‐coverage WGS for a wide range of organisms without reference genomes. This new approach has major advantages in data collection, particularly in reducing sequencing cost and computing consumption, while expanding loci choices.

CO-phylum: An Assembly-Free Phylogenomic Approach for Close Related Organisms

Co-Phylog: an Assembly-Free Phylogenomic Approach for Closely Related Organisms

OrthoPhyl – Streamlining large scale, orthology-based phylogenomic studies of bacteria at broad evolutionary scales

Prokaryotic Phylogenies Inferred from Whole-Genome Sequence and Annotation Data

EasyCGTree: a pipeline for prokaryotic phylogenomic analysis based on core gene sets

Phylogenomics from Low‐coverage Whole‐genome Sequencing

CVTree: a Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction Tool Based on Whole Genomes

Tree of Life Based on Genome Context Networks.

Whole Proteome Prokaryote Phylogeny Without Sequence Alignment: A K-String Composition Approach

Prokaryote Phylogeny Without Sequence Alignment: from Avoidance Signature to Composition Distance.

PROKARYOTIC PHYLOGENY BASED ON COMPLETE GENOMES WITHOUT SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT

Disentangling Cobionts and Contamination in Long-Read Genomic Data using Sequence Composition

Unicore enables scalable and accurate phylogenetic reconstruction with structural core genes

Ab Initio Construction and Evolutionary Analysis of Protein-Coding Gene Families with Partially Homologous Relationships: Closely Related Drosophila Genomes As a Case Study

Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species

A Phylum-Level Bacterial Phylogenetic Marker Database

Prokaryote Phylogeny Based on Ribosomal Proteins and Aminoacyl Trna Synthetases by Using the Compositional Distance Approach

An information based sequence distance and its application to whole genome phylogeny

A Simple Method for Phylogenomic Inference Using the Information of Gene Content of Genomes

APOGeT: Automated Phylogeny over Geological Time-scales

PhyloToL: A Taxon/Gene-Rich Phylogenomic Pipeline to Explore Genome Evolution of Diverse Eukaryotes