Abstract:Genus assignment is fundamental in the characterization of microbes, yet there is currently no unambiguous way to demarcate genera solely using standard genomic relatedness indices. Here, we propose an approach to demarcate genera that relies on the combined use of the average nucleotide identity, genome alignment fraction, and the distinction between type- and non-type species. More than 3,500 genomes representing type strains of species from >850 genera of either bacterial or archaeal lineages were tested. Over 140 genera were analyzed in detail within the taxonomic context of order/family. Significant genomic differences between members of a genus and type species of other genera in the same order/family were conserved in 94% of the cases. Nearly 90% (92% if polyphyletic genera are excluded) of the type strains were classified in agreement with current taxonomy. The 448 type strains that need reclassification directly impact 33% of the genera analyzed in detail. The results provide a first line of evidence that the combination of genomic indices provides added resolution to effectively demarcate genera within the taxonomic framework that is currently based on the 16S rRNA gene. We also identify the emergence of natural breakpoints at the genome level that can further help in the circumscription of taxa, increasing the proportion of directly impacted genera to at least 43% and pointing at inaccuracies on the use of the 16S rRNA gene as a taxonomic marker, despite its precision. Altogether, these results suggest that genomic coherence is an emergent property of genera in Bacteria and Archaea . IMPORTANCE In recent decades, the taxonomy of Bacteria and Archaea , and therefore genus designation, has been largely based on the use of a single ribosomal gene, the 16S rRNA gene, as a taxonomic marker. We propose an approach to delineate genera that excludes the direct use of the 16S rRNA gene and focuses on a standard genome relatedness index, the average nucleotide identity. Our findings are of importance to the microbiology community because the emergent properties of Bacteria and Archaea that are identified in this study will help assign genera with higher taxonomic resolution.

PROKARYOTIC PHYLOGENY BASED ON COMPLETE GENOMES WITHOUT SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT

Prokaryote Phylogeny Without Sequence Alignment: from Avoidance Signature to Composition Distance.

Whole Proteome Prokaryote Phylogeny Without Sequence Alignment: A K-String Composition Approach

Prokaryote Phylogeny Based on Ribosomal Proteins and Aminoacyl Trna Synthetases by Using the Compositional Distance Approach

Prokaryotic Phylogenies Inferred from Whole-Genome Sequence and Annotation Data

Phylogeny based on whole genome as inferred from complete information set analysis

Composition vector approach to whole-genome-based prokaryotic phylogeny: success and foundations.

Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea

Prokaryote Phylogeny Meets Taxonomy: an Exhaustive Comparison of Composition Vector Trees with Systematic Bacteriology

Phylogeny Reconstruction with Alignment-Free Method That Corrects for Horizontal Gene Transfer

Tree of Life Based on Genome Context Networks.

Co-Phylog: an Assembly-Free Phylogenomic Approach for Closely Related Organisms

VERTICAL HEREDITY VS. HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER: A CHALLENGE TO BACTERIAL CLASSIFICATION

Prokaryotic systematics in the genomics era

A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea

An information based sequence distance and its application to whole genome phylogeny

[Advances in Actinobacterial Systematics in Genomic Era].

OrthoPhyl – Streamlining large scale, orthology-based phylogenomic studies of bacteria at broad evolutionary scales

Genome-based Taxonomy for Bacteria: A Recent Advance.

A Proposed Genus Boundary for the Prokaryotes Based on Genomic Insights

A Genus Definition for Bacteria and Archaea Based on a Standard Genome Relatedness Index