CM Jayadevan Nam Hoang Subba Yarram UNE Business School,University of New England,Armidale,Australia
Abstract:Globalization's ramifications extend beyond borders, impacting local and global economies through intricate spatial connections, ultimately influencing economic growth trajectories. This study examines globalization's spillover impact on economic growth across 158 countries from 1990 to 2019, integrating geographical and non-geographical factors through spatial econometric techniques. The Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) based on CPSLHT (cultural, political, social, linguistic, and historical group memberships and international trade agreements) emerged as the best model compared to other spatial models. It finds expected direct positive associations between factors like initial GDP per capita, capital formation, labour force participation, economic globalization, health spending, urbanization, life insurance, poverty reduction, labour productivity, and rule of law with economic growth. However, the spillover effect of neighbouring countries on economic growth is significant and negative. The Fixed Effects SDM also identifies indirect influences on economic growth, including health spending, the age dependency ratio, and the population growth rates. Global negative effects are prevalent, especially in regions with low GDP per capita, reduced health spending, and a high age dependency ratio. Countries can enhance globalization's benefits and mitigate drawbacks by investing in healthcare, boosting labour force participation, reducing age dependency, promoting urban development, and upholding the rule of law.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper primarily explores the impact of globalization on economic growth and its spillover effects, using spatial econometrics methods to analyze this issue.
### Research Background and Objectives
The paper points out that globalization not only affects the domestic economy but also influences other countries and regions through complex geographical connections, ultimately impacting the global economic growth path. The study aims to explore the direct and indirect (spillover) effects of globalization on economic growth in 158 countries from 1990 to 2019.
### Main Findings
1. **Direct Correlation**: The paper finds a positive relationship between economic growth and factors such as initial per capita GDP, capital formation, labor force participation rate, degree of economic globalization, healthcare expenditure, urbanization level, life insurance penetration, poverty reduction effectiveness, labor productivity, and the rule of law.
2. **Neighboring Spillover Effects**: However, the economic growth of neighboring countries is significantly negatively affected by the spillover effects of globalization.
3. **Indirect Effects**: The fixed effects Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) also identifies indirect factors influencing economic growth, including healthcare expenditure, age dependency ratio, and population growth rate.
4. **Global Negative Effects**: Particularly in regions with lower per capita GDP, reduced healthcare expenditure, and higher age dependency ratios, negative global effects are more prevalent.
### Methodology
- **Spatial Durbin Model (SDM)**: The Spatial Durbin Model based on cultural, political, social, language, historical group membership, and international trade agreements (CPSLHT) is proven to be the optimal model, outperforming other spatial models.
- **Variable Selection**: The study considers both geographical and non-geographical factors, such as culture, politics, society, language, historical group membership, and international trade agreements.
- **Data Range**: The research covers data from 158 countries between 1990 and 2019.
### Practical Significance
The paper suggests that countries can enhance the benefits of globalization and mitigate its adverse effects by investing in healthcare, increasing labor force participation rates, reducing age dependency ratios, promoting urban development, and maintaining the rule of law.
In summary, this paper provides a new perspective on understanding the complex impact of globalization on economic growth by comprehensively considering geographical and non-geographical factors and utilizing spatial econometrics methods.