Residual diabetic foot osteomyelitis after surgery leads to poor clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mario C. Reyes,Mehmet A. Suludere,Arthur N. Tarricone,Tehreem Sajjad,Tyler L. Coye,Matthew J. Sideman,Lawrence A. Lavery
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13215
2024-10-09
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Abstract:The aim of this meta‐analysis is to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with and without residual osteomyelitis (ROM) after surgical bone resection for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). We completed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase using keywords DFO, Residual OM (ROM), and positive bone margins. The study outcomes included wound healing, antibiotic duration, amputation, and re‐infection. Five hundred and thirty patients were included in the analysis; 319 had no residual osteomyelitis (NROM), and 211 had ROM. There was not a significant difference in the proportion of wounds that healed 0.6 (p = 0.1, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 0.3–1.3). The risk of infection was 2.0 times higher (OR = 2.0, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.1–3.4), and the risk of amputation was 4.3 times higher (OR = 4.3, p = 0.0001, 95% CI 2.4–7.6) in patients with ROM. Patients with ROM received antibiotics significantly longer. The mean difference was 16.3 days (p = 0.02, 95% CI 11.1–21.1).
dermatology,surgery,cell biology,medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?