A Multi-Centre Case Review

Akram Uddin,David A. Russell,Fran Game,Derek Santos,Heidi J. Siddle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113083
IF: 3.9
2024-05-25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a major complication and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Systemic antibiotic therapy is often initiated first line to achieve quiescence of infection. To perform a multi-centre case review of systemic antibiotic intervention to treat adults with DFO in England and Wales and compare with national guidelines 'Diabetic foot problems: prevention and management'. Methods: Eight centres from England and Wales retrospectively collated data from a minimum of five adults (aged ≥ 18 years) from electronic case records. All patients were treated with systemic antibiotics following a new diagnosis of DFO (1 June 2021–31 December 2021). Results: 40 patients (35 males and 5 females) were included; the mean age was 62.3 years (standard deviation (SD) 13.0). Patients commenced systemic oral 14 (35%) or intravenous 26 (65%) antibiotic therapy following a new diagnosis of DFO. Twenty-seven (67.5%) patients were medically or surgically managed in the 12-week period with clinical quiescence of infection. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) had no recurrence of DFO infection within 12 weeks; seventeen (42.5%) of these patients had clinical quiescence of infection with systemic antibiotics alone without surgical intervention and nine (22.5%) of these cases had no recurrence of DFO. There were no cases of major amputation or death. All centres showed significant in-centre variability in systemic antibiotic management; variability was reported in the clinical and quantity indicators specifically to antibiotic selection, single versus dual therapy, mode of delivery and duration of treatment. Conclusions: This case review identifies there is existing variation when treating adults with systemic antibiotics for DFO. Further national guidance is required to standardise service delivery and care to improve patient outcomes.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the variability and lack of standardization in the systemic antibiotic treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) in England and Wales. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the situation of adult DFO patients receiving systemic antibiotic treatment through a multi - center case review and compare it with the national guideline "Diabetes Foot Problems: Prevention and Management". ### Research Background Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is a serious complication that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Systemic antibiotic therapy is usually used as a first - line treatment to control infection. However, there are significant differences among different medical institutions in terms of the types of antibiotics selected, single - drug or combination therapy, the mode of administration (oral or intravenous injection), and the duration of treatment. These differences may affect the treatment outcomes and prognoses of patients. ### Research Objectives 1. **Evaluate current clinical practice**: Understand the specific situation of the use of systemic antibiotics by the NHS multidisciplinary diabetes foot teams (MDFT) in England and Wales when treating adult DFO. 2. **Compare differences with national guidelines**: Compare actual clinical practice with the guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and identify the existing differences. 3. **Propose improvement suggestions**: Based on the research results, propose suggestions for standardizing service delivery and care processes to improve patient prognoses. ### Methods The study collected data from 8 MDFT centers, covering at least 5 adult patients who were diagnosed with DFO and received systemic antibiotic treatment for the first time between June 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. The data included patients' demographic information, diabetes types, DFO sites, antibiotic treatment methods and courses, and results of auxiliary examinations. ### Conclusions The study found that there are significant differences among centers in the selection and use of systemic antibiotics when treating adult DFO. These differences are mainly reflected in antibiotic selection, single - drug versus combination therapy, the mode of administration, and the duration of treatment. Therefore, the study recommends further formulating national guidelines to standardize service delivery and care processes, thereby improving the treatment outcomes of patients. ### Keywords - Bone infection - Diabetic foot osteomyelitis - Diabetic foot infection - Systemic antibiotics - Oral antibiotics - Intravenous antibiotics Through this study, the author hopes to draw attention to the standardization of DFO treatment and promote more consistent and effective clinical practice.