Abstract:Abstract When making decisions, humans aim to maximize rewards while minimizing costs. The exertion of mental or physical effort has been proposed to be one those costs, translating into avoidance of behaviors carrying effort demands. This motivational framework also predicts that people should experience positive affect when anticipating demand that is subsequently avoided (i.e., a “relief effect”), but evidence for this prediction is scarce. Here, we follow up on a previous study (1) that provided some initial evidence that people more positively evaluated outcomes if it meant they could avoid performing an additional demanding task. However, the results from this study did not provide evidence that this effect was driven by effort avoidance. Here, we report two experiments that are able to do this. Participants performed a gambling task, and if they did not receive reward they would have to perform an orthogonal effort task. Prior to the gamble, a cue indicated whether this effort task would be easy or hard. We probed hedonic responses to the reward-related feedback, as well as after the subsequent effort task feedback. Participants reported lower hedonic responses for no-reward outcomes when high vs. low effort was anticipated (and later exerted). They also reported higher hedonic responses for reward outcomes when high vs. low effort was anticipated (and avoided). Importantly, this relief effect was smaller in participants with high need for cognition. These results suggest that avoidance of high effort tasks is rewarding, but that the size off this effect depends on the individual disposition to engage with and expend cognitive effort. They also raise the important question of whether this disposition alters the cost of effort per se, or rather offset this cost during cost-benefit analyses.

Should We Really Be Afraid of "Weakness"? Applying the Insights of Attribution Theory

Powerful or Powerless when Change is Needed: Effects of Power on Escalation of Commitment

Is the feeling of 'weakness' associated with unhelpful thoughts or distress regarding symptoms?

Negative Relationships Between Self-Efficacy and Performance Can Be Adaptive: The Mediating Role of Resource Allocation

Responses to Status Manipulation and Fears of Positive and Negative Evaluations

The Self-Control Irony: Desire for Self-Control Limits Exertion of Self-Control in Demanding Settings

The effect of positive and negative evaluation on state anxiety and repetitive negative thinking in social evaluative situations: An experimental study

Increasing efficacy to reduce state anxiety: An application of the self-presentation theory of social anxiety

PHYSIQUE ANXIETY AND SELF-EFFICACY INFLUENCES ON PERCEPTIONS OF PHYSICAL EVALUATION

Investigation of the Effect of Fear and Stress on Password Choice (Extended Version)

Fear of Failure and the Zeigarnik Effect

Self‐worth Protection: review and implications for the classroom

What’s the Risk? Fearful Individuals Generally Overestimate Negative Outcomes and They Dread Outcomes of Specific Events

Need for cognition moderates cognitive effort aversion

Fear of Negative Evaluation Biases Social Evaluation Inference: Evidence from a Probabilistic Learning Task

Learned helplessness revisited: biased evaluation of goals and action potential are major risk factors for emotional disturbance

Beyond prevention: Regulating responses to self‐regulation failure to avoid a set‐back effect

When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior

The inertia of anger and sadness among adolescents and adults: The role of self-efficacy in regulating negative emotions

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk