Abstract:Purpose: This paper provides recommendations for neurorehabilitative research informed by insights from critical disability studies (CDS) and a research study that tested an augmented neurorehabilitative technology prototype. Methods: The methodology combines critical reflection, feminist science studies and CDS to analyze how neurorehabilitation and disability studies conceptualize notions of disability and cure. It offers recommendations for reconciling the conflicting ideologies of cure that operate within neurorehabilitative research. Results: The prototype acted as a kind of virtual reality hope machine that tapped into different emotions and language games regarding disability and cure. The result is five recommendations about the ways that a CDS perspective might inform neurorehabilitation research: (I) ensure clarity in recruitment materials to account for dominant social views on disability and the possibility of cure; (II) build "strong objectivity" into research methods through attention to social context and multiple meanings of terms; (III) engage in critical reflection about research processes and findings; (IV) incorporate principles of crip technoscience; and (V) include CDS perspectives in neurorehabilitation education. Conclusions: Bridging a conversation between neurorehabilitative research and CDS can address the discrepancies between ideologies of cure, and situate rehabilitation within the wider concerns of social determinants of health and disability justice.Implications for rehabilitationBridging connections between rehabilitation studies and critical disability studies can generate productive insights that open up conversations with disabled people and a commitment to disability justice.Disability and cure are social constructs and may have different meanings for patients and rehabilitation professionals.Clinicians should be mindful of the conflicting ideological constructs and socio-political dimensions of disability and cure that are operating below the surface in the rehabilitation profession and in interactions between clinicians and patients.As technology continues to transform clinical rehabilitation care through virtual reality and other innovative paradigms, rehabilitation clinicians should recognize the potential for these technologies to become "hope machines," generating patient expectations that are idealized constructions of hoped-for outcomes of returning to a previous state or level of functionality rather than predictive expectations of likely results.

Perspectives on scientific inquiry: Ethics in the conduct of rehabilitation research

Rehabilitation Professionals' Perspectives on Human Rights, Disability, and Science: A Qualitative Study

Editorial: “Social Work Ethics and Values in the Context of Criminal Rehabilitation”

Medical rehabilitation: ethical and legal issue research

Ethical considerations in clinical training, care and research in psychopharmacology

New Ethical Issues in Cerebral Palsy

Program evaluation in rehabilitation

Toward a person‐centered ethics framework for autonomy in spinal cord injury research and rehabilitation

Making Autism Research Inclusive by Attending to Intersectionality: a Review of the Research Ethics Literature

Globalizing rehabilitation psychology: Application of foundational principles to global health and rehabilitation challenges.

Complicating Narratives: Defining and Deconstructing Ethical Challenges in Community Psychology

Ethics and the Use of Technology in Rehabilitation Counseling

Research ethics for all: Development of a social-behavioral research ethics education program for community research partners with developmental disabilities

Social Validity of Research Ethics for All: Social-Behavioral Research Ethics Education for Community Research Partners with Developmental Disabilities

A framework of research priorities in COVID rehabilitation from the Rehabilitation Science Research Network for COVID: an international consultation involving qualitative and quantitative research

Brain-Computer Interfaces, Inclusive Innovation, and the Promise of Restoration: A Mixed-Methods Study with Rehabilitation Professionals

Recovering the History of Informed Consent for Data Science and Internet Industry Research Ethics

Consenting on Principles of Rehabilitation Nursing Care: A Delphi Study

Virtual reality hope machines in a curative imaginary: recommendations for neurorehabilitation research from a critical disability studies perspective

A Passing Problem: Evaluating Harm and Benefit in Autism Research

Ethical Issues in Brain–Computer Interface Research, Development, and Dissemination