Abstract:The dynamic substructuring design describes the dynamic responses in the modal, frequency and physical domains using coupling methods at joint nodes. This paper presents dynamic structuring methods to modify existing substructuring methods by merging the concept of interfacial forces in the satisfaction of compatibility conditions at joint nodes. The algorithms correspond to a type of model reduction approaches that use a few modes of substructures with the assumption of pseudo-masses at the joint nodes of the substructures. It was verified through numerical examples that the pseudo-masses rarely affected the dynamic responses of the synthesized structure. A frequency response function-based substructuring method was derived by applying interface forces at joint nodes to frequency response function (FRF). The proposed dynamic substructuring methods are expressed in explicit forms for synthesizing substructures without any numerical schemes. The validity of the proposed method was illustrated using two numerical examples. The limitations of this study are evaluated using numerical examples.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to introduce interface forces in structural dynamic analysis to satisfy the compatibility conditions at nodes, thereby improving the existing dynamic substructure methods. Specifically, the paper proposes a new dynamic substructure method. This method incorporates the interface forces between substructures into the model by assuming the inertial forces generated by pseudo - masses at nodes to achieve the synthesis of substructures. This method corresponds to a model - order - reduction method, which uses a small number of modes to describe the dynamic responses of substructures and assumes the existence of pseudo - masses at the nodes of substructures.
### Background of the Paper
The dynamic substructure method is a technique for analyzing the dynamic responses of large - scale structures and systems. It decomposes the structure into multiple substructures and assembles them at the common nodes between adjacent substructures using coupling methods. The existing substructure methods mainly include:
- **Component Mode Synthesis (CMS)**: It reduces the computational cost by introducing static interface constraint modes and retains the key dynamic characteristics.
- **Frequency - Based Substructuring (FBS)**: It is suitable for harmonic analysis and linear systems.
- **Impulse - Based Substructuring (IBS)**: It is suitable for transient dynamic analysis and can accurately capture time - dependent behaviors.
### Main Contributions of the Paper
1. **Introduction of Interface Forces**: The paper proposes a new dynamic substructure method. By assuming the inertial forces generated by pseudo - masses at nodes, the interface forces are incorporated into the model to satisfy the compatibility conditions at nodes.
2. **Explicit - Form Substructure Synthesis**: The proposed dynamic substructure method is expressed in an explicit form, and substructures can be synthesized without any numerical schemes.
3. **Verification and Application**: The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified through two numerical examples, and the limitations of this method are also discussed.
### Mathematical Model
The mathematical model in the paper mainly involves the following aspects:
1. **Equation of Motion**:
\[
M\ddot{u}+C\dot{u}+Ku = f(t)
\]
where \(M\) is the mass matrix, \(C\) is the damping matrix, \(K\) is the stiffness matrix, \(u\) is the displacement vector, and \(f(t)\) is the external force vector.
2. **Constraint Equation**:
\[
A(u,\dot{u},t)\ddot{q}=b(u,\dot{u},t)
\]
where \(q\) is the acceleration vector of the constrained system.
3. **Constraint Force**:
\[
F_c = M^{1/2}A(M^{1/2})^+(b - Aa)
\]
where “+” represents the pseudo - inverse.
4. **Frequency Response Function (FRF)**:
\[
H_{\text{cons}}=(I - R)(X + Z)^{-1}
\]
where \(X = -\Omega^2M + i\Omega C+K\), \(Z = -i\Omega RC - RK\), \(R=(M^{1/2}A(M^{1/2}))^+AM^{-1}\).
### Numerical Examples
The paper verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method through two numerical examples:
1. **Example 1**: Considered the dynamic substructure synthesis of a 3 - degree - of - freedom structure, and verified that without reducing the substructure modes or degrees of freedom, the results of the proposed method are consistent with the dynamic analysis results of the entire structure.
2. **Example 2**: Compared the dynamic analysis results of the entire model with the dynamic substructure analysis results of two substructures, and verified the effectiveness of the proposed method when considering a small number of modes.
### Conclusion
The paper proposes a new dynamic substructure method. By introducing interface forces and pseudo - masses, it effectively solves the limitations in the existing methods, and its effectiveness and applicability are verified through numerical examples.