Abstract:Background and objectives: Evidence suggests telehealth in speech and language therapy can enhance access to care, cost-effectiveness and satisfaction. However, little is known about use of telehealth in the United Kingdom. Moreover, many assessments/outcome measures for aphasia have been tested for face-to-face administration only, posing challenges to reliable use within the telehealth context. We explored the experiences and views of speech and language therapists (SLTs) working with people with aphasia on using telehealth to conduct assessments/outcome measures, perceived barriers and facilitators in telehealth, and their priorities for research in telehealth aphasia assessment. Method: We explored views of UK SLTs through an online cross-sectional survey (2021) delivered through the Qualtrics platform. The survey covered three main areas: (i) participant demographics; (ii) experience of using telehealth and doing telehealth assessments with people with aphasia post-stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (iii) plans for telehealth post-pandemic. Response formats included yes/no, multiple choice, 5-point Likert scales and open-ended text responses. The survey was expected to take no more than 10 min to complete. Survey data were analysed through descriptive statistics and content analysis of open-ended questions. Results: One hundred twenty-four SLTs responded to the survey. The majority (>80%) used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and >90% planned to continue to use telehealth in the future. The most used platforms were Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Attend Anywhere. Access to internet and telehealth platforms, and practical problems (e.g., difficulties sharing resources online, limited functionality of telehealth platforms for assessment) were common barriers. Therapists highlighted that training, resources and materials that assist the administration of assessments were important. Most participants responded that there was a need for existing measures to be tested for administration via telehealth (n = 68, 70.8%). Participants overall felt there was a need for online interactive assessments, more online resources that have been trialled for use via telehealth, accessible formats for resources for people with aphasia and clear instructions for how people with aphasia can access resources. Conclusions: This study provides new insights into the current use of telehealth assessment with people with aphasia in the United Kingdom and directions for future research. Barriers and facilitators identified can support the implementation of telehealth assessment in SLT services. What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject The use of telehealth in speech and language therapy has advantages in terms of access to care, cost-effectiveness and satisfaction with care. However, little is known about the use of telehealth in aphasia rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, especially in the area of assessment and outcome measurement. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study identified that the majority (>80%) of aphasia therapists used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and >90% planned to continue to use telehealth in the future. A need was identified for existing measures to be tested for administration via telehealth and for training, resources (e.g., online interactive assessments) and materials (e.g., accessible formats for people with aphasia). What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? To facilitate the successful implementation of telehealth assessment, there is a need for measures validated for use via telehealth and more online resources that have been trialled for use via telehealth.

Validity and satisfaction in telehealth aphasia assessment: videoconference administration of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test-Hungarian

Validation of a videoconferenced speaking test

Hungarian adaptation of the cerebellar cognitive affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale

Telehealth practice in aphasia: A survey of UK speech and language therapists, with a focus on assessment

Cross-linguistic adaptations of The Comprehensive Aphasia Test: Challenges and solutions

A Preliminary Examination of a Novel Telepractice Screening Protocol for Poststroke Aphasia

Reliability of the Brief Assessment of Transactional Success in Communication in Aphasia

Reliability and Feasibility of Administering a Child Language Assessment via Telehealth

Preliminary validation of the Mental Health Test in a psychiatric sample

Validation of the structured interview section of the penn computerized adaptive test for neurocognitive and clinical psychopathology assessment (CAT GOASSESS)

Cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis of Communication Activities of Daily Living third edition in Spanish and Catalan for people with aphasia

Tele-neuropsychology in memory clinic settings: Reliability and usability of videoconference-based neuropsychological testing

Guidelines and recommendations for cross-linguistic aphasia assessment: a review of 10 years of comprehensive aphasia test adaptations

A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers

Rapid implementation of Veterans Health Administration telehealth creative arts therapies: survey evaluation of adoption and adaptation

Development of an Adaptive Computer-Aided Soft Sensor Diagnosis System for Assessment of Executive Functions

Implementation of Eclectic Voice Therapy Program via Telepractice in Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: A Preliminary Efficacy Study

A Cerebelláris Kognitív-Affektív Szindróma Skála magyar nyelvű validációja

Evaluation of telehealth administration of MMPI symptom validity scales

The utility of physiotherapy assessments delivered by telehealth: A systematic review

Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Communication Assessment Tool for Use in a Simulated Clinical Setting