Reliability of the Brief Assessment of Transactional Success in Communication in Aphasia

Jacquie Kurland,Anna Liu,Vishnupriya Varadharaju,Polly Stokes,Robert Cavanaugh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2024.2351029
2024-05-17
Aphasiology
Abstract:Background While many measures exist for assessing discourse in aphasia, manual transcription, editing, and scoring are prohibitively labor intensive, a major obstacle to their widespread use by clinicians (Bryant et al. 2017; Cruice et al. 2020). Many tools also lack rigorous psychometric evidence of reliability and validity (Azios et al. 2022; Carragher et al. 2023). Establishing test reliability is the first step in our long-term goal of automating the Brief Assessment of Transactional Success in aphasia (BATS; Kurland et al. 2021) and making it accessible to clinicians and clinical researchers.
clinical neurology,rehabilitation,audiology & speech-language pathology,linguistics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?