Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. The Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for cardiorespiratory and metabolic function at exercise. This CPEThighlight the limiting factors, but also provides prognostic indicators. Among the prognostic factors, maximal oxygen uptake (peak VO2) has been used for many years, particularly in heart failure, but some studies have highlighted the limitations of isolated use of peak VO2. The measurement of the Ve / VCO2 slope is currently recognized as having a complementary prognostic value. However, the manner of determining the Ve / VCO2 slope is not universally established. A single CPET could therefore deliver several slope measurements depending on the method used to calculate it. This lack of clarity would lead to possible variations affecting the reflection of the severity of the disease or the prognostic power of this parameter. Our work consisted in calculating and comparing, over nearly 700 successive CPET, the slope Ve / VCO2: 1) by calculating it up to SV1, 2) by calculating it up to SV2, 3) by the calculating on all the data beyond SV2 (in the 44% of patients in whom SV2 could be determined). The patients were classified according to the indication of the examination in 1) cardiac (54%), 2) pulmonary (15%), 3) dyspnea assessment (10%) and 4) various (oncology, obesity, diabetes, rheumatic disease: 21%). The "cardiac" category was subdivided into HTP, IC, operated CPI and non operated CPI) (results not detailed in this abstract). We have found systematic and significant differences depending on how the slope is calculated. On the whole population: in patients who did not reach SV2 (n = 389), the Ve / VCO2 slope reaches 33.8 +/- 8.5 when it is calculated up to SV1 while it reaches 38.5 + / - 8.7 (p <0.001) when it is calculated over the entire CPET. On the whole population: in patients with SV2 (n = 308), the Ve / VCO2 slope reaches 29.4 +/- 5.9 when it is calculated up to SV1, 33.5 +/- 6 (p <0.001) when it is calculated up to SV2 and 37.8 +/- 6.9 (p <0.001 and p <0.001) when it is calculated over the entire examination. When we analyze in more detail the population according to the indication of the examination, we observe differences of 3.8 to 5.2 units depending on the calculation method in patients not achieving SV2 and from 7 to 8.5 units. depending on the method of calculation in patients exceeding SV2. In subdivisions of the cardiac population the differences are also large : for example in HTP, the values ranging from 34.7 +/- 7.1 to 42.9 +/- 8.9 (p <0.001) depending on the calculation method. Our work highlights that the way of determining the Ve / VCO2 slope greatly influences its value. The significant variations observed certainly limit the prognostic value of the Ve / VCO2 slope and homogenization of the calculation method seems essential in order to improve its prognostic value.

The reliability of the VO 2 Master Pro metabolic analyzer and comparison with the Cosmed Quark

Comparison of gas exchange data using the Aquatrainer system and the facemask with Cosmed K4b2 during exercise in healthy subjects

Swimming With the COSMED AquaTrainer and K5 Wearable Metabolic System in Breath-by-Breath Mode: Accuracy, Precision, and Repeatability

The Validity of the YMCA 3-Minute Step Test for Estimating Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Korean and Vietnamese Adults

Quality control of cardiopulmonary exercise equipment

Comparison between Measured and Predicted Resting Metabolic Rate Equations in Cross-Training Practitioners

Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Vmaxpro Sensor for Evaluation of Movement Velocity in the Deep Squat

Agreement between Ventilatory Thresholds and Bilaterally Measured Vastus Lateralis Muscle Oxygen Saturation Breakpoints in Trained Cyclists: Effects of Age and Performance

Comparative Analysis of the Equivital EQ02 Lifemonitor with Holter Ambulatory ECG Device for Continuous Measurement of ECG, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability: A Validation Study for Precision and Accuracy

Evaluation of the Lactate Pro blood lactate analyser

Oxygen Uptake and Bilaterally Measured Vastus Lateralis Muscle Oxygen Desaturation Kinetics in Well-Trained Endurance Cyclists

Evaluation in Healthy Subjects of a Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Wristband during Hypo and Hypercapnia Conditions

Evaluating Seismocardiography as a Non-Exercise Method for Estimating Maximal Oxygen Uptake

Influence of the method of calculating the Ve / VCO2 slope on its value in a cohort of 700 successive Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

Ventilatory Thresholds Determined from HRV: Comparison of 2 Methods in Obese Adolescents

Interchangeability between the Data Obtained by Two Powermeters during Road Cycling Competitions: A Case Study

Are the Assioma Favero Power Meter Pedals a Reliable Tool for Monitoring Cycling Power Output?

Alteration of skeletal muscle energy metabolism assessed by 31P MRS in clinical routine, part 2: Clinical application

Profiles of muscle-specific oxygenation responses and thresholds during graded cycling incremental test

Daily cardiac autonomic responses during the Tour de France in a male professional cyclist

Comparative measurement properties of constant work rate cycling and the endurance shuttle walking test in COPD: the TORRACTO® clinical trial