Abstract:Background: Various botulinumtoxinA formulations are approved for glabellar lines treatment worldwide, including abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®). Objectives: Assess abobotulinumtoxinA superiority versus placebo and non-inferiority versus active comparator (onabotulinumtoxinA; Botox®), for the treatment of Chinese patients with moderate/severe glabellar lines. Methods: Phase 3, randomized study (NCT02450526) comprising a double-blind (cycle 1) phase and an open-label (cycles 2-5) phase. Patients received abobotulinumtoxinA 50 units or matching placebo (5:1), active comparator (onabotulinumtoxinA 20 units) or matching placebo (5:1). In cycles 2-5, eligible patients were retreated with abobotulinumtoxinA only. Responders had glabellar lines of none/mild severity. Primary endpoint: responder rates at cycle 1, day 29 at maximum frown with abobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (for superiority; by investigator's live assessment [ILA] and subject's self-assessment [SSA]), and versus active comparator (for non-inferiority; by ILA). Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. Results: Overall, 520 patients were randomized. Superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, were demonstrated for abobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (ILA, SSA; both p < 0.0001) and abobotulinumtoxinA versus active comparator. AbobotulinumtoxinA efficacy was maintained over open-label cycles; median time to onset of efficacy was 2.0 days. After 6 months, 17% of patients treated with abobotulinumtoxinA remained responders. AbobotulinumtoxinA was well-tolerated. Safety results were in line with the known profile of abobotulinumtoxinA; adverse events rate decreased with repeated treatment. Conclusions: After a single injection, abobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated superiority versus placebo and non-inferiority versus onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines in Chinese patients. Multiple injections of abobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of glabellar lines in Chinese patients. Level of evidence i: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Phase III Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A (MASPORT) with DYSPORT for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trials.

Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines in Chinese Patients: A Pivotal, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind and Open-Label Phase Study

Safety and Tolerability of Onabotulinumtoxina in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines from Global Registration Studies in 5298 Participants: A Meta-Analysis.

Safety and Duration of Effect of 40-Unit PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial

Optimal Dosage of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines: Efficacy and Safety in a Clinical Trial

IncobotulinumtoxinA for Glabellar Frown Lines in Chinese Subjects: A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Controlled Phase-3 Study

A Phase-III Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial of Letibotulinum Toxin A for the Improvement of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Wrinkles in China

Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Meta-Analysis

Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines in Chinese: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

New Uses of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Aesthetics

Efficacy and Safety of PrabotulinumtoxinA in Subjects With Benign Masseteric Hypertrophy: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial and Open-Label Extension Study

Ready‐to‐use abobotulinumtoxinA solution versus powder botulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines: Investigators' and subjects' experience in a Phase IV study

Comparison of the effect of intra-dermal injection of botulinum toxin and normal saline in the treatment of facial skin pores

Subject satisfaction and psychological well‐being with escalating abobotulinumtoxinA injection dose for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines

LetibotulinumtoxinA Attenuates the Psychological Burden of Glabellar Lines and Is Associated With High Subject Satisfaction in Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Clinical Benefits of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection: Beyond Glabellar Line Effacement?

Neuromodulators in Men

Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A Injection Versus Topical 2% Glycopyrrolate for the Treatment of Primary Facial Hyperhidrosis: A Pilot Study and Review of Literature

The efficacy and safety of neubotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of forehead horizontal lines in Asians – A clinical, prospective, interventional, split‐face study

A prospective and randomized study comparing ultrasound‐guided real time injection to conventional blind injection of botulinum neurotoxin for glabellar wrinkles