Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Differentially private and explainable boosting machine with enhanced utility

Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable Boosting

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

DP-LSSGD: A Stochastic Optimization Method to Lift the Utility in Privacy-Preserving ERM

DP-EM: Differentially Private Expectation Maximization

Model Explanations with Differential Privacy

Explainable Boosting Machines with Sparsity -- Maintaining Explainability in High-Dimensional Settings

Cross Feature Selection to Eliminate Spurious Interactions and Single Feature Dominance Explainable Boosting Machines

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Bayesian Differential Privacy for Machine Learning

Individual Privacy Accounting for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent

Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization

On the Importance of Architecture and Feature Selection in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Multi-Epoch Matrix Factorization Mechanisms for Private Machine Learning

Differentially Private Algorithms for Empirical Machine Learning

Differentially Private Bilevel Optimization

Unlocking Accuracy and Fairness in Differentially Private Image Classification

Federated Boosted Decision Trees with Differential Privacy

Differentially Private Random Feature Model

S-BDT: Distributed Differentially Private Boosted Decision Trees