Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable Boosting

Differentially private and explainable boosting machine with enhanced utility

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Model Explanations with Differential Privacy

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

Unlocking Accuracy and Fairness in Differentially Private Image Classification

How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy

Mitigating Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy in Differentially Private Learning.

Bayesian Differential Privacy for Machine Learning

Fair Differential Privacy Can Mitigate the Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy

Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness

Differentially Private Optimizers Can Learn Adversarially Robust Models

Embedding Differential Privacy in Decision Tree Algorithm with Different Depths.

Does Differential Privacy Impact Bias in Pretrained NLP Models?

The privacy-explainability trade-off: unraveling the impacts of differential privacy and federated learning on attribution methods

Differential Privacy for Anomaly Detection: Analyzing the Trade-off Between Privacy and Explainability

Explainable Differential Privacy-Hyperdimensional Computing for Balancing Privacy and Transparency in Additive Manufacturing Monitoring

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Differentially Private Bayesian Neural Networks on Accuracy, Privacy and Reliability

Federated Boosted Decision Trees with Differential Privacy

Privacy Meets Explainability: A Comprehensive Impact Benchmark