Abstract:Forensic handwriting examiners (FHE) activities are focused on comparative analysis of handwritten objects such as signatures. Their role is to provide and evaluate evidence for and against the authenticity of a questioned signature. In recent years, cases involving handwritten signatures captured on electronic devices have become more commonplace. These so-called 'dynamic signatures' (also known as 'digitally captured signatures') are much different from paper-based signatures. Not only does the medium of recording differ, but also the type, volume of data and features are different from the pattern-based evidence that makes up paper-based signatures. Recent developments in forensic science - including signature examination - have led to the adoption of evaluative probabilistic methodologies in many disciplines [see, e.g. ENFSI 1915 Guidelines]. In the current paper, a probabilistic model to evaluate signature evidence in the form of multivariate data, as proposed and described in Wacom Europe GmbH (2019), is adopted. Topics like data sparsity, joint evaluation of multiple features and feature selection are investigated. Performed experimental studies showed an accuracy rate above 90% even when a limited number (5) of reference signatures was available. The performances of a multivariate approach are compared with those characterizing a so-called multiplicative approach where variables (features) are taken as independent and the Bayes' factor (BF) is obtained as the product of univariate BFs associated to each selected feature. The simplicity of this latter approach is, however, accompanied by severe issues about the reliability of results. The use of a multivariate approach is therefore highly recommended. Finally, the evidential values in correspondence of alternative feature sets are compared. Results suggest that discriminative features are writer-related and necessitate a case-specific selection.

The Role of the Bayes Factor in the Evaluation of Evidence

Using Bayes factors to limit forensic testimony to forensics: composite hypotheses

Bayesian networks and probabilistic reasoning about scientific evidence when there is a lack of data

A probabilistic graphical model for assessing equivocal evidence

Bayesian Reasoning and Evidence Communication

Defence Against the Modern Arts: the Curse of Statistics "Score-based likelihood ratios"

How to Measure Evidence and Its Strength: Bayes Factors or Relative Belief Ratios?

A Good check on the Bayes factor

Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data

The Influence of Validation Data on Logical and Scientific Interpretations of Forensic Expert Opinions

A Bayesian approach for the analysis of error rate studies in forensic science

Generalized fiducial factor: an alternative to the Bayes factor for forensic identification of source problems

What is a Bayes factor?

Using evidence to make decisions

Quantification of the weight of fingerprint evidence using a ROC-based Approximate Bayesian Computation algorithm for model selection

Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making

Bayesian reasoning and the prior in court: not legally normative but unavoidable

Calculating the Likelihood Ratio for Multiple Pieces of Evidence

Empirical Bayes factors for common hypothesis tests

Bayesian evaluation of dynamic signatures in operational conditions

A Note on the Specific Source Identification Problem in Forensic Science in the Presence of Uncertainty about the Background Population