Abstract:Spatial ability (SA) is the mental ability to create, maintain, and manipulate abstract visual representations. Studies have shown that SA is a strong predictor of success in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). More recently, attention has extended to the field of architecture, a discipline where spatial thinking skills are fundamental, yet students in this field have not been extensively examined in terms of their spatial abilities. Therefore, SA skills are essential for students in engineering and architecture during their initial academic phases. This research was conducted within an interdisciplinary academic college and describes in detail a new integrated and hybrid training program that is part of a recent mixed-methods study. This program was built to effectively enhance the SA of first-year undergraduate students in a cost-effective manner, using a multi-method teaching strategy. The training program spanned more than 20 h across four sessions. This article focuses on the training methodology, encompassing four key phases, and serves as a complementary article to the one that was just published separately, describing the effectiveness of this intervention program as measured using SA standard tests. Notably, in certain scenarios, these phases were combined rather than being standalone independent modules. The traditional teaching method (TTM) lays the foundation for SA knowledge via lectures and collaborative interactions. Subsequently, computer-based learning (CBL), using tools such as SketchUp and GeoGebra, facilitates in-depth virtual geometric exploration. Augmented reality (AR) training offers an immersive learning experience, allowing students to interact with 3D objects in real-world environments. Finally, the building real model (BRM) phase transforms 2D designs into tangible 3D structures. This study highlights the comprehensive training approach, emphasizing the robust learning environment facilitated by integrating these phases as part of the full mixed-methods research. The suggested integrated training program was qualitatively explored through post-intervention evaluations to understand participants' experiences and perceptions.

Debiasing architectural decision-making: a workshop-based training approach

The Influence of Cognitive Biases on Architectural Technical Debt

Using Social Choice Theory to Finalize Architectural Decisions

Tracking Decision-Making During Architectural Design

Educating Engineering Students to Address Bias and Discrimination Within Their Project Teams

What rationales drive architectural decisions? An empirical inquiry

Debiasing Judgements Using a Distributed Cognition Approach: A Scoping Review of Technological Strategies

Empathy Enabled by Critical Design - A New Tool in the Universal Design Toolbox

Modular interface for managing cognitive bias in experts

Towards debiasing code review support

Workshop on Detection and Design for Cognitive Biases in People and Computing Systems

An Empirical Study on Collaborative Architecture Decision Making in Software Teams

The Impact of Architects' Reasoning on Early Design Decision-Making for Energy-Efficient Buildings

Uncovering Architectural Design Decisions

Design space construction: a framework to support collaborative, parametric decision making

Adaptive Data Debiasing through Bounded Exploration

Form Follows Parameter: Algorithmic-Thinking-Oriented Course for Early-stage Architectural Education

Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-making

A Longitudinal Study of Identifying and Paying Down Architectural Debt

A Set of Estimation and Decision Preference Experiments for Exploring Risk Assessment Biases in Engineering Students

Enhancing Spatial Ability: A New Integrated Hybrid Training Approach for Engineering and Architecture Students