Abstract:This survey study aims to determine the experiences of the software industry experts with respect to architectural decision‐making, influencing factors in decision‐making, and difficulties they encounter. The findings revealed that the most challenging aspect is dealing with decisions that have a "major business impact". Information sharing and decision tracking are areas that need improvement. Software architecture plays a fundamental role in overcoming the challenges of the development process of large‐scale and complex software systems. The software architecture of a system is the result of an extensive process in which several stakeholders negotiate issues and solutions, and as a result of this negotiation, a series of architectural decisions are made. This survey study aims to determine the experiences of the software industry experts with respect to architectural decision‐making, the factors that are effective in decision‐making, and the technical and social problems they encounter. An online questionnaire‐based survey was conducted with 101 practitioners. The responses were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Analysis of responses revealed that the majority of the participants prefer to document some or all of the architectural decisions taken and to store these documents in web‐based collaboration software. Decisions are usually made by teams of two or three, and discussion‐based approaches (brainstorming and consensus) are adopted. In the software architecture decision‐making process, "major business impact" is the most challenging situation. Information sharing and keeping track of decisions and decision rationale are areas in need of improvement as identified by most participants. From the participants' feedback and their answers to open‐ended questions, we concluded that the software architecture decision‐making process has an important role in the industry. Our key findings are that decisions made in the architectural decision‐making process are taken by teams and generally all decisions are documented. In projects where decisions are made by a single person, peer pressure is found to be significantly different from pressure in projects where decisions are made by the group. This is an indication that as the number of people in the decision‐making process increases, the disagreements also increase.

Tracking Decision-Making During Architectural Design

Recording and managing design decision-making processes through an object-oriented framework

A CAD-based decision support system for the design stage of a construction project

DesignTracking: Track and Replay BIM-based Design Process

Software Architecture Decision-Making Practices and Challenges: An Industrial Case Study

An Empirical Study on Collaborative Architecture Decision Making in Software Teams

Using Social Choice Theory to Finalize Architectural Decisions

Architectural Design Decision: Existing Models and Tools.

A Survey of Architectural Design Decision Models and Tools

Debiasing architectural decision-making: a workshop-based training approach

Group Decision Support System for Project Cooperative Design

Design space construction: a framework to support collaborative, parametric decision making

Do Architectural Design Decisions Improve the Understanding of Software Architecture? Two Controlled Experiments

Architecture Design for the Large-Scale Software-Intensive Systems: A Decision-Oriented Approach and the Experience

Building design teamwork supported by a collaborative CAD modeling process analysis

A group decision-making model for architectural programming in megaprojects

Factors affecting architectural decision‐making process and challenges in software projects: An industrial survey

Group Decision-based Collaborative Design

A Design Strategy For Collaborative Decision Making In A Distributed Environment

The use of reinforced learning to support multidisciplinary design in the AEC industry: Assessing the utilization of Markov Decision Process

Modeling Tool for Software Architecture Design Decisions