Life Cycle Assessment of Plant-Based vs. Beef Burgers: A Case Study in the UK

Meshach Tang,Taghi Miri,Fakhteh Soltani,Helen Onyeaka,Zainab T. Al-Sharify

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114417

IF: 3.9

2024-05-24

Sustainability

Abstract:As the world attempts to decarbonise the food industry and limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs) have emerged as a sustainable alternative to traditional meat. The objective of this study is to assess the environmental impacts of PBMAs compared to traditional beef burgers, aiming to address the research gap in the life cycle assessments (LCAs) of publicly available PBMA recipes. Utilising a cradle-to-fork system boundary, this research conducted a rigorous LCA on a 100 g plant-based burger patty and its beef burger (BB) counterpart, each produced in the UK but sourced from different global locations. The results demonstrated that the plant-based burger had significantly lower environmental impacts across several categories, including a 65% reduction in global warming potential and a 45% reduction in water consumption. A simple extrapolation illustrated that if the UK population switched from beef to meat analogue patties, 3 million tonnes of CO2e could be saved annually, corresponding to 0.74% of the country's yearly territorial GHG emissions. Scenario analyses displayed how the environmental impact of the MA patty remained stable regardless of changes in exportation, ingredient origin or soy protein sourcing. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis conducted with an alternative characterisation method corroborated the initial findings, whilst uncertainty analysis ensured that nearly all of the conclusions generated from the original comparison were robust. Future studies should conduct LCAs on PBMA patties with commercial recipes using varied plant-based sources, as well as fully understanding any potential health implications of long-term PBMA consumption.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the differences in environmental impacts between plant - based meat analogues (PBMA) and traditional beef patties, especially for products in the UK market. The research aims to fill the research gap in the existing literature regarding the life - cycle assessment (LCA) of publicly available plant - based meat analogue recipes. By comparing the environmental impacts of the two products, the research hopes to provide data support for policymakers to promote more sustainable food choices and offer guidance to consumers regarding environmentally - friendly food choices.

Specifically, the research objectives include:

1. **Evaluating environmental impacts**: Through the cradle - to - fork system boundary, conduct a comprehensive life - cycle assessment of 100 grams of plant - based meat analogue and 100 grams of beef patty, and compare their performance in multiple environmental impact categories such as global warming potential and water resource consumption.

2. **Quantifying potential emission reductions**: Through simple extrapolation, the research estimates how many carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions could be reduced annually if the UK population switches from beef patties to plant - based meat analogues, and what proportion this corresponds to the UK's annual territorial greenhouse gas emissions.

3. **Analyzing impacts under different scenarios**: Through scenario analysis, the research explores the stability of the environmental impacts of plant - based meat analogues under factors such as exports and changes in raw material sources. In addition, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis are also carried out to ensure the robustness of the research conclusions.

4. **Future research directions**: It is recommended that future research should conduct life - cycle assessments using different plant - based raw materials and commercial formulations, and comprehensively understand the potential health impacts of long - term consumption of plant - based meat analogues.

In conclusion, this research aims to provide strong evidence support for plant - based meat analogues as a sustainable meat substitute through scientific methods.