Abstract:Background and objectives Unmyelinated C-fibres comprise the largest group of somatic afferents and have demonstrated a crucial role not only in the perception of high-threshold mechanically, thermally or chemically induced pain, but also in non-harmful low-threshold mechanical stimuli [1,2]. The objective of our study was to characterize differential sensitivity changes of C-fibre related subclasses of high-threshold and low-threshold polymodal nociceptors and low-threshold mechanoreceptors to the local anaesthetic (LA) mepivacaine during nerve block of the purely sensory lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) in human. We assumed a diverse response of different classes of afferents to the two different concentrations of the LA mepivacaine (Scandicaine). Methods In a double-blind randomized experimental setting, an ultrasound-guided nerve block of the LFCN was performed in 10 healthy male subjects, each with two different concentrations of mepivacaine (0.5 and 1%). Responsiveness of afferent nerve fibres to different noxious and non-noxious stimuli was tested by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) 30, 180, and 300 min after nerve block. Both LA concentrations of mepivacaine were compared for time course of the areas of anaesthesia for the tested sensory modalities. Results Initial extension of anaesthetic areas at 30 min did not differ between both LA concentrations. At 180 min only the anaesthetic areas to nociceptive stimuli were reduced at the site of lower mepivacaine injection (260mN: 204mm2 (18; 244; median difference and 95% confidence interval; p < 0.05), heat: 276mm2 (3; 305)). In contrast, no significant differences were found between the two concentration when non-nociceptive stimuli were used (100mN: 187mm2 (4; 240), p >0.05, brush: 159mm2 (-59; 202)). Conclusion Equal initial sizes of anaesthesia areas for all sensory modalities can be explained by supramaximal perineural LA molecule concentration in both administered mepivacaine dosages. Upon washout of the LA nociceptive function is restored faster as compared to non-nociceptive sensation and higher concentration of the LA are required to maintain the analgesia. Quantitative sensory testing is able to detect different susceptibility of low threshold mechanosensors and subtypes of nociceptive C-fibres to mepivacaine. Using painful mechanical, heat and electrical stimulation different classes of nociceptors will be activated. The analgesic areas to electrical stimulation were particularly small; one might therefore hypothesize that the proposed protocol allows to also differentiate mechano-insensitive ("silent") and mechanosensitive ("polymodal") nociceptors. Implications QST is a non-invasive method to functionally examine sensory modalities and their pharmacological modulation in humans. The method is sufficiently sensitive to differentiate the analgesic properties of mepivacaine at 0.5 and 1% and might also be adequate to different classes of nociceptors. Further development of nociceptive stimuli including supra-threshold encoding characteristics will enable to investigate peripheral analgesic effects more specifically and thus might help to design new analgesics with preferential effect on high frequency discharge of nociceptors.

[Comparative studies of the local anaesthetic action of carticaine 1% and mepivacaine 1% (author's transl)]

Comparison of ultrasound-guided vs.anatomical landmark-guided axillary brachial plexus block

Effect Analysis of Epidural Anesthesia with 0.4% Ropivacaine in Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery.

Low Volume and High Concentration of Local Anesthetic Is More Efficacious than High Volume and Low Concentration in Labat's Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison

Discriminative sensory characteristics of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve after mepivacaine-induced block

Comparing the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone As Perineural Adjuvants on Peripheral Nerve Block

Comparing the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone As Perineural Adjuvants on Peripheral Nerve Block A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Differences in sensory nerve block between levobupivacaine and bupivacaine at low concentrations in humans and animals

Levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the rat

Comparision of Pharmacokinetics Between Ropivacaine Methanesulfonate and Ropivacaine Hydrochloride During Epidural Block

Comparative Study between Using Lidocaine Alone versus Using Lidocaine Combined with Either Ketamine, Nitroglycerine or Paracetamol for Bier Block in Upper Limb Surgeries Distal to The Elbow: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Continuous Axillary Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Active Mobilization of Flexor Tendon

Pain during venous cannulation: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial of analgesic effect between topical amethocaine and eutectic mixture of local anesthetic

Lameness of horses is effectively ameliorated with a low volume of mepivacaine administered as a palmar digital nerve block

Comparison of anesthetic solutions used in lumbar and caudal peridural anesthesia

Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars

Clinical comparison of the efficacy and safety of epidural ropivacaine mesylate and ropivacaine hydrochloride

Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for intrathecal anesthesia during outpatient arthroscopic surgery

Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?

Comparisons of Chlorprocaine with Bupivacaine or Ropivacaine in Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia for Lower Extremity Surgery

Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Four Topical Anesthetics