Progress of Research on the Biomechanics of Aorta and Stent Graft.
Li Yong-sheng,Dong Zhi-hui,Zhu Hua-gang,Fu Wei-guo,Wang Yu-qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20131655
IF: 6.133
2013-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:With improvements in the technology of clinical diagnosis of aortic diseases, more and more cases have been found on such vascular lesions as aortic dissection and abdominal aortic aneurysm, which lead to aortic biomechanical changes. Aortic biomechanics research will become a hot spot in the near future. At the same time, stent grafts (SGs) are widely used in the endovascular treatment of vascular diseases. The biomechanical properties of SGs will also become a focus of research. Understanding the relation between the aorta and SGs will better cater to clinical services by improving the success rate of surgery for aortic diseases and reducing intraoperative and postoperative complications. This article reviews researches on the biomechanics of the aorta and SGs. NATURE OF AORTIC BIOMECHANICS The aorta is composed of uniform, incompressible material. It has such properties of viscoelastic materials as creeping, stress relaxation, and hysteresis. Viscoelasticity, a characteristic of biological materials, pertains to the deformation that is dependent upon the strain rate. In other words, the constant stress load results in nonlinear deformation of the artery, and the deformation is related to the endurance of speed. The modulus of elasticity is the ratio of the stress of the organizations in per unit area to the strain of the organizations under stress. It is suitable for a description of the elasticity of the organization when the stress-strain curve is nonlinear. The elastic properties of the wall can be indexed by computing the elastic modulus. The mechanical properties of the elastic fibers, collagen fibers, and smooth muscles of the vascular wall are different. Elastic fibers have a low modulus of elasticity and collagen fibers have a higher modulus of elasticity. The elastic modulus of smooth muscles is similar to that of elastic fibers; its exact value depends on its physiological activity. The viscoelastic properties of the aorta have been studied in China as well as outside China. Venkatasubramanian et al1 studied stress-strain properties in different conditions through uniaxial tensile steting by pig femoral arteries. The research of scholars outside China is primarily based on normal animal blood vessels. In China, viscoelastic studies have been conducted by Li et al2 on the human abdominal aorta and Huang and Ma3 on the human ascending aorta. SGs' BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTY The biomechanical properties of SGs as medical materials for human body (e.g., burst pressure, radial compliance, vertical compliance, radial compression and support force) have high demand in all respects, including sufficient strength to resist back stretch of the arterial wall, the same length of the stent after releasing to facilitate precise fixation, good axial flexibility to pass through curved blood vessels, smaller outer profile without releasing and high expansion rate when releasing to facilitate through a thinner catheter, damage to the vessel wall as small as possible to reduce stent restenosis caused by the intimal hyperplasia, and long product life to maintain its long-term performance in the human body. The pros and cons of such performance will directly affect its clinical application. The aforementioned characteristics of SGs rely on the mechanical and physical properties of the material. Commonly used SGs in clinics are from Medtronic, COOK, Gore, and other companies. BIOMECHANICAL TESTING OF THE AORTA Preservation of fresh specimens Among aortic biomechanical testing, a very important principle is to ensure fresh organization and maximize its similarity to the structure of living tissue, and thereby to obtain accurate experimental results. The following three methods can be adopted: (1) immediate testing after getting materials; (2) soaking the samples in sterilized liquid paraffin and storing in the refrigerator at 4°C; and (3) under sterile conditions, saving the artery in low-temperature nutrient solution and removing before the experiment. In theory, it is best to go on with immediate experimentation, but due to various constraints, it may be difficult to guarantee that the biomechanical experiment can begin in a few hours after samples have been acquired. Chen et al4 studied the biomechanical properties of human aorta that was stored in liquid nitrogen with the conclusion that the liquid nitrogen storage method with programmed cooling had no significant effect on the arterial biomechanical properties. The biomechanical properties of the aortic valve and aortic wall that had been stored in liquid nitrogen within 3 years tended to be more stable with reduced differences between individuals, and could be used for surgery. The differences obviously increased between individuals with the same kinds of valve that had been stored in liquid nitrogen for more than 4 years, and so they should not be used clinically. Specimens were gradually cooled in liquid nitrogen to save, drawn out, and gradually rewarmed before experimenting. These results were close to the biomechanical properties of fresh aorta. Presetting of the aortic wall As the aorta is a biological material, its flexibility mainly comes from the entropy change, and therefore there is no single natural state. The same loading and unloading processes must be repeated before experiments, which are the so-called preconditioners.5 With one Newton preload, repeat stretching and relaxation for 10 cycles until an ideal state is achieved. Blood vessels, with periodic uniform uniaxial loading and unloading, result in force-deformation curve hysteresis, indicating that there is entropy change and loss of mechanical energy in the deformation process. The curve gradually shifts to the right initially. After some repetitions, the difference between the adjacent curves constantly reduces and eventually disappears with the “steady state” achieved. Consequently, the stress-strain relations of blood vessels own to repetitive personality after the pretreatment.6 Aortic tensile test Reading microscope is used to measure the size of a sample, which is, in general, 25 mm in length, 3 mm in width, and 1.2-1.8 mm in thickness. A preset aortic specimen is clamped to a soft tissue fixture, which is connected to a plexiglass cylinder with pH 7.4 normal saline where the sample is placed. The sample fixture and testing machine chuck are also connected. With a 35-250°C ambient temperature box in the testing machine, the temperature can be automatically adjusted so that a constant temperature is maintained to simulate a normal body temperature field of (36.5±0.5)°C. Preset the computer program with the sample stress increasing at a strain speed of 20% per minute. The computer will automatically output the stress-strain curves and data after the specimen is destroyed. The elastic modulus can be obtained by the elastic segment of the tensile curve, with the aorta experimental data for statistical analysis.7 STENT GRAFT-RELATED BIOMECHANICAL TEST Burst pressure of the vascular graft Mechanical strength is the most basic of all mechanical properties of the vascular graft. The preparation of vascular graft demands high mechanical strength and excellent physical and chemical properties that maintain strength for a long time to be able to withstand the impact of blood flow in the body. The vascular graft is banded at one end with the ligature; the other end with the tee is connected to the pressure testing device and pressurized injection device. Inject 37°C saline to the vascular graft through an injection device at a speed of 3 ml/min. The burst pressure is obtained when the vessel wall suddenly ruptures and the saline seeps. The burst pressure of vascular grafts should be higher than the normal systolic blood pressure of human artery so that they can withstand the arterial blood pressure within the blood vessels after transplantation. Through experiments, Liu et al8 made vascular grafts with burst pressure of (43.5±8.3) kPa, which is much higher than the normal systolic blood pressure of human artery (12.0-18.7 kPa). The burst pressure of the graft is closely related to type III and type IV endoleak formation in clinics after stent implantation. Grafts' compliance The compliance of the grafts includes radial compliance, vertical compliance, and volume compliance, which, respectively, refer to the changes in vessel diameter, length, and volume when the pressure changes. It is an important mechanical indicator of vascular grafts.9 The greater the compliance, the closer the mechanical properties of artificial grafts to those of natural blood vessels. Radial compliance has the greatest impact on the long-term patency rate of blood vessels, while longitudinal compliance can reduce the suture line stress at the anastomotic mouth in transplant surgery. When vascular grafts do not match with the host blood vessels in compliance, there can be hemodynamic changes of the vascular graft site, which likely lead to thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia at the anastomosis. Thrombosis can cause vascular congestion in the short term, while endometrial hyperplasia is the main factor affecting the graft's long-term patency rate. It is reported that the compliance of polyester is (1.9±1.2)% per 100 mmHg and that of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is (0.9±0.1)% per 100 mmHg,10,11 but that of artificial grafts is (5.96±0.87)% per 100 mmHg.9 Under the pull, the axial elongation trend of vascular grafts is close to that of physiological blood vessels, but as the tension increases, the stress-strain curve of vascular grafts will become more and more flat. It shows that the flexibility of vascular grafts decreases when the tension increases. Stents' radial compression and support force Stents' radial compression force refers to the size of the radial force from the pressure column to the stent in the compression test. In the test the diameters of the stents are often compressed and deformed to half of the original, that is, the given load deformation rate is 50%. In the whole process, the various deformation rates in correspondence to the size of the strength are recorded so that the compressive force-radial compression strain curves of the stents can be obtained. Wang and Wang12 conducted a preliminary study on stents' radial compression and analyzed the influences of different weaving and process parameters. The magnification and self-expanding nature of the stent could result in radial support force. Dong et al13 reported that radial strength may play a more leading role in the formation of new distal break by SG. The proximal stentderived new break which only occurs in the greater curvature is not the same as the distal stent break in both the greater curvature side and the lesser curvature side. There are several reasons for increasing the stents' distal radial support force. First, there is the taper angle in the course of aortic walking; second, the diameter of distal landing area is less than the proximal; and finally SG oversizing is often based upon the diameter of the proximal landing zone, which is often significantly greater than that of the distal true lumen, causing a relatively higher radial force against the distal anchoring zone. It can be seen that the injury brought by SG radial force is the dominant factor in the formation of the distal SG-derived new break. SG's spring-back force The SG is similar to a spring. When released in the aortic arch or other curved sites, it results in passive bending with a tendency to spring back to its initial straight status. Such spring-back force tends to concentrate on the greater curvature side of the aortic arch and both ends of the stent.13 SG's passive bending is very common in the endovascular repair for Stanford B dissection because the primary entry often occurs at the aortic isthmus and the SG has to be placed across the aortic arch. Logically, the more the SG bends, the greater might be the generation of the springback force. In the formation of new break in the proximal stent-borne, spring-back force seems to play a more leading role than the radial force. There are four possible reasons: (1) all proximal SG-induced new breaks appear in the greater curvature, consistent with the direction of springback force; (2) in most cases, the proximal SG is nearer to the bending point, and spring-back force is easier to focus on the proximal; (3) even though attention has been paid to minimize SG oversizing, the proximal SG-induced new entry still occurs; and (4) previously the strong radial force of proximal bare frame was considered the dominant factor causing the proximal SG-induced new entry. Recently, however, it has also been found to occur in the SG without proximal bare stent. OUTLOOK Because public awareness of blood vessel disease and research on stent technology have been relatively new, the biomechanical study of the aorta and the stent is far from perfect. The problems arising in clinical practices require that we proceed from basic theory research including the study of biomechanics, with consideration of both the aortic and artificial stent factors, balancing between them, and better matching them to adapt to the physiological state of the body. Currently, biomechanical research needs to be further improved, for example, by increasing the sample amount, establishing a suitable animal model, refining and quantifying various mechanical indexes, mechanical coupling blood vessels, and stents, and deepening discussions from the perspectives of organizational structure. In clinical practice, it would help doctors to personalize treatment in accordance to the characteristics of individual patients by considering the type, location, and change of mechanical properties of lesions among patients, improving the design process of the stent, and producing stent-related mechanical parameters, such as radial support strength and spring-back force at an angle bending.