Higher Validity, Lower Radiation: A New Ictal Single‐Photon Emission Computed Tomography Framework

Felix Bitzer,Lennart Walger,Tobias Bauer,Freya Schulte,Florian C. Gaertner,Matthias Schmitz,Martin Schidlowski,Randi von Wrede,Attila Rácz,Tobias Baumgartner,Vadym Gnatkovsky,Daniel Paech,Valeri Borger,Hartmut Vatter,Bernd Weber,Dominik L. Michels,Tony Stöcker,Markus Essler,Josemir W. Sander,Alexander Radbruch,Rainer Surges,Theodor Rüber
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27061
IF: 11.2
2024-08-23
Annals of Neurology
Abstract:Objective To assess whether arterial spin labeling perfusion images of healthy controls can enhance ictal single‐photon emission computed tomography analysis and whether the acquisition of the interictal image can be omitted. Methods We developed 2 pipelines: The first uses ictal and interictal images and compares these to single‐photon emission computed tomography and arterial spin labeling of healthy controls. The second pipeline uses only the ictal image and the analogous healthy controls. Both pipelines were compared to the gold standard analysis and evaluated on data of individuals with epilepsy who underwent ictal single‐photon emission computed tomography imaging during presurgical evaluation between 2010 and 2022. Fifty healthy controls prospectively underwent arterial spin labeling imaging. The correspondence between the detected hyperperfusion and the postoperative resection cavity or the presumably affected lobe was assessed using Dice score and mean Euclidean distance. Additionally, the outcomes of the pipelines were automatically assigned to 1 of 5 concordance categories. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 43 individuals who underwent epilepsy surgery and by 73 non‐surgical individuals with epilepsy. Compared to the gold standard analysis, both pipelines resulted in significantly higher Dice scores and lower mean distances (p
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?