Abstract:Despite strong evidence of important benefits of volume-targeted ventilation, many high-risk extremely preterm infants continue to receive traditional pressure-controlled ventilation in the United States and elesewhere. Reluctance to abandon one's comfort zone, lack of suitable equipment and a lack of understanding of the subtleties of volume-targeted ventilation appear to contribute to the relatively slow uptake of volume-targeted ventilation. This review will underscore the benefits of using tidal volume as the primary control variable, to improve clinicians' understanding of the way volume-targeted ventilation interacts with the awake, breathing infant and to provide information about evidence-based tidal volume targets in various circmstances. Focus on underlying lung pathophysiology, individualized ventilator settings and tidal volume targets are essential to successful use of this approach thereby improving important clinical outcomes. Two fundamentally different approaches to controlling gas flow during positive pressure ventilation are possible. In pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), sometimes also referred to as pressure-limited ventilation(PLV), the primary control variable is inflation pressure and the volume of gas entering the lungs (tidal volume,V T ) is the dependent variable that changes as the baby breathes more vigorously or lung mechanics change. The basic functionality of PCV devices is that of a T-piece resuscitator, providing a fixed inflation pressure with every breath regardless of the tidal volme delivered to the lungs. In volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), gas delivery into the ventilator circuit is the primary control variable and pressure becomes the dependent variable, changing as necessary to compensate for the baby breathing and to overcome resistive and elastic forces of the lungs. An innovative third option is volume-targeted ventilation that combines advantages of both modalities by automatically adjusting inflation pressure to maintain a target tidal volume, as will be described in detail later in this paper. Technological limitations of mechanical ventilation devices available in the early days of neonatal intensive care made it difficult to precisely regulate tidal volume delivery to the tiny lungs of newborn infants. Regulating inflation pressue was much easier and consequently pressure-controlled, time-cycled ventilation became the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In addition, the use of uncuffed endotracheal tubes with variable amounts of gas leakage around them meant that accurate tidal volume measurement was unavailable and clinicians had to rely on auscultation and visual assessment of chest rise to judge adequacy of ventilation. Despite these limitations, neonatologists became accustomed to this approach and many continue to employ pressure-controlled ventilation despite compelling evidence that volume-targeted ventilation reduces adverse consequences of mechanical ventilation. 1 The ability to control the inflation pressure and time, and tolerance of large leaks around uncuffed endotracheal tubes continue to be seen by some as the major advantages of PCV. The belief that inflation pressure is the main factor in lung injury (we refer to this as 'barophobia') has persisted to this day, despite clear evidence that pressure by itself does not injure the lung unless it results in excessively large tidal volume. 2

Numerical study of variable lung ventilation strategies

Effect of Individualized Protective Pulmonary Ventilation Strategy on Pulmonary Ventilation in Elderly Patients under General Anesthesia

Variable Ventilation as a Diagnostic Tool for the Injured Lung

Design of a new variable-ventilation method optimized for lung recruitment in mice

Individualized Mechanical Power-Based Ventilation Strategy for Acute Respiratory Failure Formalized by Finite Mixture Modeling and Dynamic Treatment Regimen

Driving pressure decoded: Precision strategies in adult respiratory distress syndrome management

Machine learning algorithm for ventilator mode selection, pressure and volume control

Abstract No.: ABS3339: Effects of volume controlled and pressure controlled volume guaranteed modes of ventilation on respiratory dynamics during laparoscopic surgery in children: A prospective observational study

Pressure Control Ventilation Versus Volume Control Ventilation in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Narrative Review

Sharing ventilators in the Covid-19 pandemics. A bench study

Virtual patients for mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit

Ventilation of nonparalyzed patients under anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway, comparison of three modes of ventilation: Volume controlled ventilation, pressure controlled ventilation, and pressure controlled ventilation-volume guarantee

Adaptive Pressure Control Ventilation: Set It and Don't Forget It?

Physiologic comparison of neurally adjusted ventilator assist, proportional assist and pressure support ventilation in critically ill patients

Volume-Targeted Ventilation

Variable positive end-expiratory pressure in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome: an advanced ventilation modality

Mathematical modeling of lung mechanics and pressure‐controlled ventilation design for barotrauma minimization: A numerical simulation study

Pressure- vs. volume-controlled ventilation and their respective impact on dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness: a cross-over animal study

Modalities of Mechanical Ventilation: Volume-Targeted Versus Pressure-Limited

Mechanical ventilation strategy for pulmonary rehabilitation based on patient-ventilator interaction

Associating local strains to global pressure–volume mouse lung mechanics using digital image correlation