Abstract:Background: One of the significant changes in intensive care medicine over the past two decades is the acknowledgement that improper mechanical ventilation settings substantially contribute to pulmonary injury in critically ill patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions can be used to optimize mechanical ventilation settings in intensive care units (ICUs) and to improve patient outcomes. Specifically, machine learning algorithms can be trained on large datasets of patient information and mechanical ventilation settings. These algorithms can then predict patient responses to different ventilation strategies and suggest personalized ventilation settings for individual patients. Objective: In this study, we aimed to design and evaluate an AI solution that could tailor an optimal ventilator strategy for each critically ill patient who requires mechanical ventilation. Methods: We proposed a reinforcement learning-based AI solution using observational data from multiple ICUs in the US. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of optimal oxygen saturation and the proportion of optimal mean arterial blood pressure. We trained our AI agent to recommend low/medium/high levels of three ventilator settings - positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and ideal body weight-adjusted tidal volume - according to patients' health conditions. We defined a policy as a set of rules guiding ventilator setting changes given specific clinical scenarios. Off-policy evaluation metrics were applied to evaluate the AI policy. Results: We studied 21,595 and 5,105 patients' ICU stays from the eICU Collaborative Research (eICU) and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) databases respectively. Using the learnt AI policy, we estimated the hospital mortality rate (eICU 12.1±3.1%; MIMIC-IV 29.1±0.9%), proportion of optimal oxygen saturation (eICU 58.7±4.7%; MIMIC-IV 49.0±1.0%), and proportion of optimal mean arterial blood pressure (eICU 31.1±4.5%; MIMIC-IV 41.2±1.0%). Based on multiple quantitative and qualitative evaluation metrics, our proposed AI solution outperformed observed clinical practice.We studied 21,595 5105 and 5,105 21595 patients' ' ICU stays from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care -IV (MIMIC-IV)(1) and eICU Collaborative Research (eICU) and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) databases respectively. Observed hospital mortality rates were 18.2% (eICU) and 31.1% (MIMIC-IV). UsingFor the learnt AI policy, we estimated the hospital mortality rate (eICU 14.7±0.7%; MIMIC-IV 29.1±0.9%), proportion of optimal oxygen saturation (eICU 57.8±1.0%; MIMIC-IV 49.0±1.0%), and proportion of optimal mean arterial blood pressure (eICU 34.7 ± 1.0%; MIMIC-IV 41.2±1.0%). Based on multiple quantitative and qualitative evaluation metrics, our proposed AI solution has potential to outperformed observed clinical practice. Conclusions: Our study found that customizing ventilation settings for individual patients led to lower estimated hospital mortality rates compared to actual rates. This highlights the potential effectiveness of using RL methodology to develop AI models that analyze complex clinical data for optimizing treatment parameters. Additionally, our findings suggest the integration of this model into a clinical decision support system for refining ventilation settings, supporting the need for prospective validation trials.

Virtual patients for mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit

Pulmonary response prediction through personalized basis functions in a virtual patient model

Using the Past to Inform the Future: How a Classic Respiratory Physiology Equation Informs Computer-Based Simulators and Clinical Decision Support Systems*

Individualized Mechanical Power-Based Ventilation Strategy for Acute Respiratory Failure Formalized by Finite Mixture Modeling and Dynamic Treatment Regimen

Computational physiological models for individualised mechanical ventilation: a systematic literature review focussing on quality, availability, and clinical readiness

Retrospective Validation of a Computerized Physiologic Equation to Predict Minute Ventilation Needs in Critically Ill Children

Five Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Critically Ill Patients with Mechanical Ventilation in Intensive Care Units: a Retrospective and Multi Database Study.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Success in Patients with Respiratory Failure, Including Those with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Automated evaluation of typical patient-ventilator asynchronies based on lung hysteretic responses

Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation

Mechanical Ventilator Parameter Estimation for Lung Health through Machine Learning

A Novel Non-invasive Predictor Measure of Left Atrial Pressure and Practical Implicates in High Frequency Ventilation: Theory

Patient-ventilator asynchrony classification in mechanically ventilated patients: Model-based or machine learning method?

Machine learning modelling for predicting the utilization of invasive and non-invasive ventilation throughout the ICU duration

A physiology-based mathematical model for the selection of appropriate ventilator controls for lung and diaphragm protection

Prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit via machine learning: a COVID-19 perspective

Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Ventilator Settings for Patients on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study

A personalised computational model of the impact of COVID-19 on lung function under mechanical ventilation

Patient-specific prediction of regional lung mechanics in ARDS patients with physics-based models: A validation study

Physiological hardware-in-the-loop test bench for mechanical ventilation

Development and validation of a reinforcement learning algorithm to dynamically optimize mechanical ventilation in critical care