Abstract:Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) with side fenestration on the needle was developed aiming to obtain both cytological aspirates and histological core samples. To reveal the diagnostic yield of FNB sampling solid mass compared to standard fine needle aspiration (FNA), we conducted a large-scale multicenter study in patients with pancreatic and non-pancreatic masses. We also aimed to establish optimal techniques in EUS tissue acquisition. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter single-blind randomized controlled trial. Between December 2014 and January 2016, 408 patients were enrolled from five tertiary-care academic medical centers and randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either 22G FNA or 22G FNB. Two tissue acquisition (TA) techniques (1st and 2nd passes using slow pull vs. 3rd and 4th passes using suction methods) were performed on all EUS needles. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield comparing FNA and FNB on all solid lesions, pancreatic and non-pancreatic masses, respectively. Secondary endpoints were the quality of the histologic specimen (quantity of cell, tissue integrity, and blood contamination). Results: Among all lesion, FNB group (n=190) compared to FNA group (n=187) gained superior histological diagnostic yield (91.44% vs. 80%; p = 0.0015), and higher cytological diagnostic yield (85.56% vs. 78.95%; p = 0.093). For pancreatic mass, FNB group (n=123) achieved better histological diagnostic yield compared to FNA group (n=126) (92.68% vs. 81.75%; p = 0.0099), and also higher cytological diagnostic yield (88.62% vs. 79.37%; p = 0.00468), respectively. For non-pancreatic mass, there was no difference between FNB and FNA on diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore for pancreatic mass, when slow pull technique was applied in the first and second passes, FNB was superior to FNA on specimen quality and diagnostic yield. Conclusion: FNB needle achieved superior overall diagnostic yield compared to FNA needle among all studied solid lesions. For pancreatic masses, the 22G FNB needle also gained superior histological diagnostic accuracy and higher cytological diagnostic yield compared to 22G FNA. We further suggest choosing FNB over FNA on pancreatic lesion for TA when slow pull technique was applied in the first two passes.Table: Table. Technical characteristics and outcomes of EUS-FNA/FNB

Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS-fine needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration or Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB for diagnosis of solid pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial

A Prospective Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing FNA and FNB in the Diagnosis of Solid Masses

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound (Eus)-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Using 22-Gauge and 25-Gauge Needles for Pancreatic Masses

A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions

Optimal Sampling Technique for EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using a 25-Gauge ProCore Needle: A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Superiority Study

Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy Vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Percutaneous ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: An analysis of 1074 lesions

Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review

How to Perform Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy of Pancreatic Lesions?

Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis

EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB in Pancreatic Solid Lesions ≤ 15 mm

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study

Diagnostic Yield of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Lesions

Direct Comparison of Elastography Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration and B-Mode Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions

Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Guided Fine‐Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Impact of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Results in the Management and Outcome of Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses

Cutting edge of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions