Investigating the intensity and integration of active learning and lecture.

Amedee Marchand Martella,Darryl W. Schneider,Garrett M. O’Day,Jeffrey D. Karpicke,Garrett M. O'Day
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000160
2024-02-03
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Abstract:Given that the active learning literature lacks systematic investigations on how the intensity and integration of lecture and active learning affect learning, we conducted two experiments to examine the impact of these variables. The first experiment involved 146 participants who learned about biological taxonomies through pure lecture or pure active learning. Participants in the pure lecture condition scored significantly higher on a posttest than those in the pure active learning condition. The second experiment involved 219 participants who learned about biological taxonomies through pure lecture, a lecture and active learning activity that were interspersed, or a lecture and active learning activity that were blocked. Participants in the interspersed condition scored significantly higher than participants in the blocked and pure lecture conditions (which did not significantly differ). Based on these experiments, it may not be a question of either/or but rather a question of how to integrate lecture and active learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
psychology, experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?