Efficacy and Safety of Isophane Protamine Insulin Injection 30R to Isophane Protamine Biosynthetic Human Insulin Injection 30R in Type 2 Diabetics Poorly Controlled with Oral Hypoglycemic Agents
Huan LIAO,Qing SU,Jie JIN,Tao YANG,Bei SHEN,Jian WANG,Yang-tian WANG,Xing-bo CHENG,Yun XIE,Zhong-yan SHAN,Yan-li CAO,Peng ZHANG,Jia HE,Da-jin ZOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2011.05.006
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of isophane insulin injection 30R and isophane protamine biosynthetic human insulin injection 30R in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus poorly controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents.Methods One hundred and forty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus poorly controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents from June,2009 to June,2010 were divided randomly in a ratio of 1:1 into group A and group B.There was no differences in age,gender,height,weight between the two groups.The group A and group B were given isophane protamine insulin injection 30R and isophane protamine biosynthetic human insulin injection 30R respectively.All the patients were injected insulin before breakfast and supper together with previous oral agents for 12 weeks.Insulin dosage was determined and adjusted according to blood glucose.At the end of the 12 week,the two groups exchanged the insulins and continued the therapy for another 12 weeks.The glycated hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc),fasting blood glucose(FBG),2 h postprandial blood glucose (PBG) and insulin autoantibody (IAA) were investigated at the end of the treatments.Paired t test and Wilcoxon test were used in the data analysis.Results After 12 weeks,there were no significant differences in HbAlc ((7.7 ± 1.3 )% vs (7.5 ±0.9)%,t=1.24,P>0.05),FBG((8.0±2.0) vs (7.4±1.6)mmol/L,t=1.05,P>0.05) and PBG ( ( 13 ± 4) vs ( 12 ± 4) mmol/L,t =0.90,P > 0.05 ) in group A and group B.After 24 weeks,no significant differences in the above-mentioned indexes was found between the two groups either:HbAlc ((8.3±1.5)% vs (7.5 ±1.0)%,x2 =0.01,P>0.05),FBG ((7.8±2.0) vs (7.9±2.1) mmol/L,x2=0.04,P>0.05) andPBG ((12±4) vs (12±4)mmoL/L,x2=0.82,P>0.05).The levels of IAA were comparable between the two groups at the end of the 12th week ( ( 19 ± 12) vs ( 19 ± 13) mU/L,t =0.11,P>0.05) and at the end of the 24th week ((19 ±11) vs (18 ±12) mU/L,x2 =1.26,P>0.05).The incidence of hypoglycemia in group A was 16.4% before insulin-exchanging and 6.4% after,and that was 15.0% and 2.9% in Group B.No hypersensitivity reaction in local skin,lipoatrophy or subcutaneous nodule occurred during the investigation.Conclusion The results suggest that isophane insulin injection 30R has the same efficacy and safety as isophane protamine biosynthetic human insulin injection 30R.