The Association of Flap Transfer Vs. Excision with Secondary Healing on Patient Satisfaction in Nasal Mass Surgery: A Cohort Study

Xinyu Li,Datao Li,Yiyuan Li,Feng Xu,Zhicheng Xu,Qun Zhang,Xia Chen,Ruhong Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.037
2024-01-01
Abstract:Background Nasal cutaneous tumors impact both appearance and function, affecting patients' well-being. This study compares outcomes of second intention healing, where wounds heal naturally, with flap transfer in nasal defect repair after tumor resection to evaluate its viability as an alternative. Methods In this multi-center study, 80 patients who underwent second intention healing and 70 patients receiving flap transfer after nasal tumor resection between July 2018 and June 2023 were included. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative details, and wound healing time were collected. Scar outcomes were evaluated at 6 months post-operation using the Vancouver Scar Scale and visual analog scale. Results The second intention healing group showed significantly better outcomes compared to the flap transfer group. The Vancouver Scar Scale score was lower in the second intention group (3.51 ± 0.22 vs. 3.98 ± 0.68, P = 0.02), indicating better scar quality. Superior outcomes were observed in vascularity, pigmentation, and pliability on the Observer POSAS scale. Patients reported better color, irregularity, and higher satisfaction with wound care experience. The overall patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the second intention group (7.59 ± 0.24 vs. 7.16 ± 0.10, P = 0.02). Conclusion This cohort study suggests that second intention healing is associated with higher patient satisfaction in nasal cutaneous tumor surgery compared to flap transfer. These findings support considering second intention healing as an alternative in nasal cutaneous tumor treatment. Further research is needed to validate these results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?