Abstract:There are numerous evidence showing that consumers usually experience emotional dissonance (e.g. purchase regret) and anticipate it in consideration set formation process. Our paper investigates how anticipated regret affects consumers' consideration set formation and the relevant implications on sellers' price and assortment competition. We adopt a parallel search paradigm to explore how consumers form their consideration sets and use search depth and search breadth to alleviate anticipated regret, and to check how sellers optimally choose their prices and assortment sizes accordingly. Intuitively, regret not only lowers consumer surplus but also intensifies sellers' competition as consumers have incentive to include more competitive alternatives in consideration set to alleviate regret. However, our findings show that these intuitions may not always hold when search depth (i.e., the number of attributes to evaluate) is a choice. Specifically, we show that sellers may benefit from anticipated regret as it encourages consumers 1) to evaluate more product attributes (i.e., a deeper search depth) to alleviate regret (which increases consumers' willingness to pay); 2) to include less sellers to save search costs (which soften sellers' competition). Surprisingly, our results also show that anticipated regret can achieve a ``win-win-win situation for consumers, sellers and social planner. We further explore sellers' assortment and price competition in reaction to anticipated regret, and demonstrate that sellers engage in assortment competition when regret intensity is low but price competition when it is high. Lastly, we show that both search cost and assortment may amplify the benefits of anticipated regret. Our analytic results provide potential interpretation to customers' search behavior under ecommerce environment and could guide sellers' assortment strategy and platform's search environment design.

Towards Strong Regret Minimization Sets: Balancing Freshness and Diversity in Data Selection

K-Regret Minimizing Set: Efficient Algorithms and Hardness.

Efficient Processing of k-regret Minimization Queries with Theoretical Guarantees

Price and Assortment Competition under Consideration Set Formation: the Role of Anticipated Regret

Efficient K-Regret Query Algorithm with Restriction-free Bound for Any Dimensionality

Multi-Objective Submodular Maximization by Regret Ratio Minimization with Theoretical Guarantee

Finding Average Regret Ratio Minimizing Set in Database

A minimax regret approach for robust multi-objective portfolio selection problems with ellipsoidal uncertainty sets

The Worst-Case Discounted Regret Portfolio Optimization Problem.

A Three-Way Decision Methodology With Regret Theory via Triangular Fuzzy Numbers in Incomplete Multiscale Decision Information Systems

Skyline: Stacking Optimal Solutions in Exact and Uncertain Worlds.

Regret Theory-Based Three-Way Decision Method on Incomplete Multiscale Decision Information Systems With Interval Fuzzy Numbers

Regret theory-based fuzzy multi-objective portfolio selection model involving DEA cross-efficiency and higher moments

Minimax Regret Learning for Data with Heterogeneous Subgroups

Regret-based Multi-Objective Route Choice Models and Stochastic User Equilibrium: a Non-Compensatory Approach

Robust Min-Max (Regret) Optimization using Ordered Weighted Averaging

Robust Decision Making Using a General Utility Set

Adaptive Robust Optimization with Minimax Regret Criterion: Multiobjective Optimization Framework and Computational Algorithm for Planning and Scheduling under Uncertainty

Risk minimization, regret minimization and progressive hedging algorithms

On the KL-Divergence-based Robust Satisficing Model

A preference group consensus method with three-way decisions and regret theory under multi-scale information systems