Abstract:Empirical risk minimization, a cornerstone in machine learning, is often hindered by the Optimizer's Curse stemming from discrepancies between the empirical and true data-generating <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://distributions.To" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> address this challenge, the robust satisficing framework has emerged recently to mitigate ambiguity in the true distribution. Distinguished by its interpretable hyperparameter and enhanced performance guarantees, this approach has attracted increasing attention from academia. However, its applicability in tackling general machine learning problems, notably deep neural networks, remains largely unexplored due to the computational challenges in solving this model efficiently across general loss functions. In this study, we delve into the Kullback Leibler divergence based robust satisficing model under a general loss function, presenting analytical interpretations, diverse performance guarantees, efficient and stable numerical methods, convergence analysis, and an extension tailored for hierarchical data structures. Through extensive numerical experiments across three distinct machine learning tasks, we demonstrate the superior performance of our model compared to state-of-the-art benchmarks.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to solve a core challenge in machine learning: **the problem that the Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) model performs poorly when faced with the difference between the training data and the real - data distribution**. Specifically, the paper focuses on the "Optimizer’s Curse" caused by the inconsistency between the training data and the real - data generating distribution, that is, the model performs well on the training set but poorly on the test set, and may even be worse than an untrained model.
To solve this problem, the paper introduces a Robust Satisficing Model (RS) based on Kullback - Leibler (KL) divergence. Traditional RS models usually use the Wasserstein distance to handle distribution changes, but its application in general machine learning tasks (such as deep neural networks) is limited by computational complexity. Therefore, this paper proposes using KL divergence as a tool to measure distribution differences and applies it to general loss functions, thus providing a new framework - **the KL - Divergence Robust Satisficing Model (KL - RS model)**.
### Main contributions
1. **Proposing the KL - RS framework**: For general machine learning tasks, a new KL - RS framework is proposed, which can achieve the highest robustness within a given tolerance range. In addition, considering the hierarchical structure characteristics of data generation, an extended version suitable for hierarchical data structures - the Hierarchical KL - RS model is also proposed.
2. **Theoretical analysis and performance guarantee**: A comprehensive theoretical analysis of the KL - RS model is carried out, providing interesting analytical explanations and new performance guarantees. A numerical algorithm based on alternating optimization and exploring monotonicity and convex structures is developed, and a convergence analysis is provided. In particular, the algorithm has the advantages of unbiasedness and normalization, ensuring efficient and stable performance.
3. **Experimental verification**: Extensive numerical experiments are carried out through three different machine learning tasks (label distribution shift, long - tail learning, fair PCA), and the results show that the KL - RS model outperforms the existing state - of - the - art benchmark methods in these tasks. The experiment also deeply explores the influence of tolerance and vulnerability measures on performance under different distribution shifts.
### Related work
Existing research mainly focuses on using the Wasserstein distance to handle distribution changes because the Wasserstein distance is suitable for capturing geometric perturbations of the distribution. However, it cannot effectively handle non - geometric distribution shifts, such as transition kernel shifts in MDP, label distribution shifts, and domain adaptation problems. In addition, the Wasserstein distance has a high computational complexity under general loss functions, which limits its practical application. In contrast, KL divergence, as an information - difference - measurement tool widely used in machine learning, performs well in handling label distribution shifts, disentangled representation learning, and domain generalization problems, but its application in the robust satisficing model has not been fully studied.
In summary, by introducing the KL - RS model, this paper fills the gaps in existing research and provides a new and effective method for handling distribution - change problems in machine learning.