Abstract:Hydrological models have been developed in response to the need to understand the complex water cycle of the Earth and to assess its interaction with historical and future climate scenarios. In the global water sector of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b), six land surface models (LSMs), eight hydrological models (GHMs), and one dynamic vegetation model (DGVM) are contributing with transient simulations spanning from 1660 to 2300. The model simulations follow a common protocol and are driven by common bias adjusted climate model outputs combined with plausible socio-economic scenarios and representative concentration pathways. The main goal of this study is to highlight similarities and differences among these models in simulating the vertical water balance. The main similarity of these models consists in the water cycle simulation, even if the models have been developed for different purposes such as energy cycle (LSMs), water cycle (GHMs), or vegetation cycle (DGVM) simulation. In particular, we address the following research question: 1) what equations are used to compute water storages and water fluxes; 2) how different are the equations among the models; 3) how the equations were adjusted; 4) how many parameters are used by the models; 5) how often the parameters are used; 6) how similar or different are the parameters among the models. To this end, we apply a standard writing style of the water storages and water fluxes included in the models, to easily identify the similarities and differences among them. Most of the models include in their structure the canopy, soil, and snow storages, and almost half of them include the groundwater storage. Furthermore, we find that: 1) a model needs a very good documentation, this would help to easily identify and understand the equations in the code; 2) some modelers teams use common approaches resulting in similar equations of water storages or water fluxes, but different models structures still lead to different models results; 3) collaboration and communication among the modelers are necessary, on the one hand, for the realization of the models standard writing style, and on the other hand, for a better understanding of the models themselves, especially their strengths, limitations and results. Overall, our results (i) help to better explain the different models results and to attribute these to the differences in simulating specific processes; (ii) contribute to the remarkable efforts in creating a common protocol and a common input datasets for well-defined simulations; (iii) foster a better understanding of how the models work and finding new ways of improvement and development.

A Parsimonious Daily Water Balance Model Based on the Proportionality Hypothesis

Estimation of Watershed Hydrologic Processes in Arid Conditions with a Modified Watershed Model

An Easily Implemented Agro-Hydrological Procedure with Dynamic Root Simulation for Water Transfer in the Crop–soil System: Validation and Application

Investigating Dynamic Parameter Importance of a High-Complexity Hydrological Model and Implications for Parameterization

A Proportionality-Based Multi-Scale Catchment Water Balance Model and Its Global Verification

Similarities and Differences among Fifteen Global Water Models in Simulating the Vertical Water Balance

A unified framework of water balance models for monthly, annual, and mean annual timescales

Understanding Each Other's Models: an Introduction and a Standard Representation of 16 Global Water Models to Support Intercomparison, Improvement, and Communication

A Two-parameter Monthly Water Balance Model and Its Application in Hanjiang River Basin

The General Formulation for Runoff Components Estimation and Attribution at Mean Annual Time Scale

Unifying Catchment Water Balance Models for Different Time Scales Through the Maximum Entropy Production Principle

Using Precipitation, Vertical Root Distribution, and Satellite‐retrieved Vegetation Information to Parameterize Water Stress in a Penman‐Monteith Approach to Evapotranspiration Modeling under Mediterranean Climate

Quantitative Assessment of Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on Streamflow Changes Using an Improved Three-Parameter Monthly Water Balance Model

A Modified Xinanjiang Model for Quantifying Streamflow Components in a Typical Watershed in Eastern China

A New Numerical Model for Simulating Top Surface Soil Moisture and Runoff

Modeling the Crop Transpiration Using an Optimality-Based Approach

Integrated numerical model for irrigated area water resources management

Estimating Hydrological Parameters Based on Rainfall Patterns in River Basins with No Long-Term Historical Observations

Spacial Responses of the Parameter of Distributed Hydrological Model Based on Runoff Simulations

Establishing a quantitative assessment methodology framework of water conservation based on the water balance method under spatiotemporal and different discontinuous ecosystem scales

Development and Testing of a Simple Physically-Based Distributed Rainfall-Runoff Model for Storm Runoff Simulation in Humid Forested Basins