Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

Less is More: Relative Rank is More Informative Than Absolute Abundance for Compositional NGS Data.

Compositional Data Analysis is necessary for simulating and analyzing RNA-Seq data

Evaluating Cross-Platform Normalization Methods for Integrated Microarray and RNA-seq Data Analysis

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

Normalization Methods for the Analysis of Unbalanced Transcriptome Data: A Review

Identification and Characterization of Genes with Absolute Mrna Abundances Changes in Tumor Cells with Varied Transcriptome Sizes

Modeling expression ranks for noise-tolerant differential expression analysis of scRNA-seq data

Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences

Bias, robustness and scalability in differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data

Comparison of Scrna-Seq Data Analysis Method Combinations.

Differential analysis in Transcriptomic: The strength of randomly picking 'reference' genes

Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis

Impact of RNA-seq data analysis algorithms on gene expression estimation and downstream prediction

Evaluation of Normalization Methods for RNA-Seq Gene Expression Estimation

Robust Transcriptional Signatures for Low-Input RNA Samples Based on Relative Expression Orderings

Deciphering gene expression patterns using large-scale transcriptomic data and its applications

A Systematic Comparison of Normalization Methods for Eqtl Analysis

Union Exon Based Approach for Rna-Seq Gene Quantification: to Be or Not to Be?

Methods for evaluating gene expression from Affymetrix microarray datasets

Gene Ranking of RNA-Seq Data Via Discriminant Non-Negative Matrix Factorization

Comprehensive evaluation of differential expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data