Preservation and Transformation of Modern Socialist Residential Building Heritage of China: Exemplified by Beijing Baiwanzhuang Neighborhood and Shanghai Caoyang No.1 Estate for Workers

Qianhui Zhao,Feng Song
2023-01-01
Abstract:The contradiction between preservation and transformation has always been a critical theme in the field of heritage conservation, particularly evident in modern residential heritage, especially within the context of China. On one hand, due to economic constraints in the past few decades, the construction standards of such heritage buildings were relatively low. The living conditions no longer meet the needs of current local residents. The residents' desire for improved living conditions clashes with the imperative to preserve the material remnants, placing them in a dilemma between preservation and transformation. On the other hand, as a result of economic development and urban expansion, the economic location of residential heritage has undergone significant changes. The low-density development pattern is in contradiction with the economic location of the high land price, leading to strong pressures for renovation and renewal. Residential heritages are not easily categorized as landmark heritage projects imbued with specific political or cultural significance. In the contemporary development of urbanization in China, their survival is in an extremely delicate position. This study selects Baiwanzhuang Neighbourhood in Beijing and Caoyang No.1 Estate in Shanghai to conduct a comparative study. Baiwanzhuang Neighbourhood and Caoyang No.1 Estate are emblematic examples of modern residential heritage in New China, representing crucial material legacies under the great historical process of China's socialist practice. The study will first briefly trace the morphological process of Baiwanzhuang Neighbourhood and Caoyang No.1 Estate, identifying their heritage preservation value. Then, the study will pay particular attention to the comparative analysis of preservation and transformation measures taken by the two modern residential heritages, engaging in a deep reflection on the relationship between preservation and transformation from a morphological perspective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?