Urban Versus Rural Differences in Meeting 24-H Movement Behaviour Guidelines among 3-4-year-olds: an Analysis of SUNRISE Pilot Study Data from 10 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Jackline J Nusurupia,Leyna H Germana,Pujitha Wickramasinghe,Hong K Tang,Nyaradzai Munambah,Mohammad S Hossain,Pham Bang,Guan Hongyan,Alex Antonio Florindo,Catherine E Draper,Denise Koh,Kuston Sultoni,Anthony D Okely,Mark S Tremblay,Xanne Janssen,John J Reilly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.70008
2024-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Insufficient physical activity, excessive screen time and short sleep duration among young children are global public health concerns; however, data on prevalence of meeting World Health Organisation 24-h movement behaviour guidelines for 3-4-year-old children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are limited, and it is unknown whether urbanisation is related to young children's movement behaviours. The present study examined differences in prevalence of meeting 24-h movement behaviour guidelines among 3-4-year-old children living in urban versus rural settings in LMICs. METHODS:The SUNRISE Study recruited 429, 3-4-year-old child/parent dyads from 10 LMICs. Children wore activPAL accelerometers continuously for at least 48 h to assess their physical activity and sleep duration. Screen time and time spent restrained were assessed via parent questionnaire. Differences in prevalence of meeting guidelines between urban- and rural-dwelling children were examined using chi-square tests. RESULTS:Physical activity guidelines were met by 17% of children (14% urban vs. 18% rural), sleep guidelines by 57% (61% urban vs. 54% rural), screen time guidelines by 50% (50% urban vs. 50% rural), restrained guidelines by 84% (81% urban vs. 86% rural) and all guidelines combined by 4% (4% urban vs.4% rural). We found no significant differences in meeting the guidelines between urban and rural areas. CONCLUSIONS:Only a small proportion of children in both rural and urban settings met the WHO 24-h movement guidelines. Strategies to improve movement behaviours in LMICs should consider including both rural and urban settings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?