Abstract:National annual inventories of CO2 emitted during fossil fuel consumption (FFCO2) bear 5–10% uncertainties for developed countries, and are likely higher at intra annual scales or for developing countries. Given the current international efforts of mitigating actions, there is a need for independent verifications of these inventories. Atmospheric inversion assimilating atmospheric gradients of CO2 and radiocarbon measurements could provide an independent way of monitoring FFCO2 emissions. A strategy would be to deploy such measurements over continental scale networks and to conduct continental to global scale atmospheric inversions targeting the national and one-month scale budgets of the emissions. Uncertainties in the high-resolution distribution of the emissions could limit the skill for such a large-scale inversion framework. This study assesses the impact of such uncertainties on the potential for monitoring the emissions at large scale. In practice, it is more specifically dedicated to the derivation, typical quantification and analysis of critical sources of errors that affect the inversion of FFCO2 emissions when solving for them at a relatively coarse resolution with a coarse grid transport model. These errors include those due to the mismatch between the resolution of the transport model and the spatial variability of the actual fluxes and concentrations (i.e. the representation errors) and those due to the uncertainties in the spatial and temporal distribution of emissions at the transport model resolution when solving for the emissions at large scale (i.e. the aggregation errors). We show that the aggregation errors characterize the impact of the corresponding uncertainties on the potential for monitoring the emissions at large scale, even if solving for them at the transport model resolution. We propose a practical method to quantify these sources of errors, and compare them with the precision of FFCO2 measurements (i.e. the measurement errors) and the errors in the modelling of atmospheric transport (i.e. the transport errors). The results show that both the representation and measurement errors can be much larger than the aggregation errors. The magnitude of representation and aggregation errors is sensitive to sampling heights and temporal sampling integration time. The combination of these errors can reach up to about 50% of the typical signals, i.e. the atmospheric large-scale mean afternoon FFCO2 gradients between sites being assimilated by the inversion system. These errors have large temporal auto-correlation scales, but short spatial correlation scales. This indicates the need for accounting for these temporal auto-correlations in the atmospheric inversions and the need for dense networks to limit the impact of these errors on the inversion of FFCO2 emissions at large scale. More generally, comparisons of the representation and aggregation errors to the errors in simulated FFCO2 gradients due to uncertainties in current inventories suggest that the potential of inversions using global coarse-resolution models (with typical horizontal resolution of a couple of degrees) to retrieve FFCO2 emissions at sub-continental scale could be limited, and that meso-scale models with smaller representation errors would effectively increase the potential of inversions to constrain FFCO2 emission estimates.

Comparison of Different Methods to Parameterize Errors in Inverse Modeling of Atmospheric Emissions

Effects of Auxiliary Atmospheric State Parameters on the Aerosol Optical Properties Retrieval Errors of High-Spectral-resolution Lidar.

Regularized framework for inverse problems in continuous atmospheric emissions: An application to the Fukushima accident

Regularization Parameter Identification for Nonlinear Inverse Modeling of Atmospheric Emissions

Modeling uncertainties for tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns affecting satellite-based inverse modeling of nitrogen oxides emissions

Is the efficacy of satellite-based inversion of SO 2 emission model dependent?

Inverse Modeling of Black Carbon Emissions over China Using Ensemble Data Assimilation

Comparison of Adjoint and Analytical Bayesian Inversion Methods for Constraining Asian Sources of Carbon Monoxide Using Satellite (mopitt) Measurements of Co Columns

The optimization of SO 2 emissions by the 4DVAR and EnKF methods and its application in WRF-Chem

TOTAL VARIATION REGULARIZED INVERSE MODELING TOWARDS ENVIRONMENTAL OBSERVATIONS WITH TEMPORAL ABSENCES

A New Approach to Estimate Pollutant Emissions Based on Trajectory Modeling and Its Application in the North China Plain

Estimation of Observation Errors for Large-Scale Atmospheric Inversion of CO2 Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion

Biases of Aerosol Simulation in the AerChemMIP Models over China and Impact of Emission Uncertainties

Assessing the Iterative Finite Difference Mass Balance and 4d‐var Methods to Derive Ammonia Emissions over North America Using Synthetic Observations

The use of satellite and ground based measurements for estimating and reducing uncertainties in the spatial distribution of emissions of nitrogen oxides

Optimal estimation of initial concentrations and emission sources with 4D-Var for air pollution prediction in a 2D transport model

Joint Release Rate Estimation and Measurement-by-measurement Model Correction for Atmospheric Radionuclide Emission in Nuclear Accidents: an Application to Wind Tunnel Experiments.

Inverse Modeling of SO2 and NOx Emissions over China Using Multisensor Satellite Data – Part 1: Formulation and Sensitivity Analysis

High-spatiotemporal-resolution inverse estimation of CO and NOx emission reductions during emission control periods with a modified ensemble Kalman filter

Wind Tunnel Validation Study of Joint Estimation Source Term Inversion Method

Flow-dependent observation errors for greenhouse gas inversions in an ensemble Kalman smoother