Abstract:Global climate models often underestimate aerosol loadings in China, and these biases can have significant implications for anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing and climate effects. The biases may be caused by either the emission inventory or the treatment of aerosol processes in the models, or both, but so far no consensus has been reached. In this study, a relatively new emission inventory based on energy statistics and technology, Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), is used to drive the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5) to evaluate aerosol distribution and radiative effects against observations in China. The model results are compared with the model simulations with the widely used Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC AR5) emission inventory. We find that the new MEIC emission improves the aerosol optical depth (AOD) simulations in eastern China and explains 22–28 % of the AOD low bias simulated with the AR5 emission. However, AOD is still biased low in eastern China. Seasonal variation of the MEIC emission leads to a better agreement with the observed seasonal variation of primary aerosols than the AR5 emission, but the concentrations are still underestimated. This implies that the atmospheric loadings of primary aerosols are closely related to the emission, which may still be underestimated over eastern China. In contrast, the seasonal variations of secondary aerosols depend more on aerosol processes (e.g., gas- and aqueous-phase production from precursor gases) that are associated with meteorological conditions and to a lesser extent on the emission. It indicates that the emissions of precursor gases for the secondary aerosols alone cannot explain the low bias in the model. Aerosol secondary production processes in CAM5 should also be revisited. The simulation using MEIC estimates the annual-average aerosol direct radiative effects (ADREs) at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), at the surface, and in the atmosphere to be −5.02, −18.47, and 13.45 W m−2, respectively, over eastern China, which are enhanced by −0.91, −3.48, and 2.57 W m−2 compared with the AR5 emission. The differences of ADREs by using MEIC and AR5 emissions are larger than the decadal changes of the modeled ADREs, indicating the uncertainty of the emission inventories. This study highlights the importance of improving both the emission and aerosol secondary production processes in modeling the atmospheric aerosols and their radiative effects. Yet, if the estimations of MEIC emissions in trace gases do not suffer similar biases to those in the AOD, our findings will help affirm a fundamental error in the conversion from precursor gases to secondary aerosols as hinted in other recent studies following different approaches.

Biases of Aerosol Simulation in the AerChemMIP Models over China and Impact of Emission Uncertainties

Emission or Atmospheric Processes? an Attempt to Attribute the Source of Large Bias of Aerosols in Eastern China Simulated by Global Climate Models

Comparison of the Anthropogenic Emission Inventory for CMIP6 Models with a Country-Level Inventory over China and the Simulations of the Aerosol Properties

Comparison of the Anthropogenic Emission Inventory for CMIP6 Models with a Country-Level Inventory over China Andthe Simulations of the Aerosol Properties

Impact of a new emission inventory on CAM5 simulations of aerosols and aerosol radiative effects in eastern China

Model Bias in Simulating Major Chemical Components of PM2.5 in China

Model bias in simulating major chemical components of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in China

Assessment of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Model Performance in Simulating the Spatial-Temporal Variation of Aerosol Optical Depth over Eastern Central China

The Measurement of Aerosol Optical Properties at a Rural Site in Northern China

Comparisons and Evaluation of Aerosol Burden and Optical Depth in CMIP5 Simulations over East Asia

Assessment of AOD by 16 CMIP6 Models Based on Satellite-Derived Dataset from 2000-2014 over Eastern Center China

Quantify contribution of aerosol errors to cloud fraction biases in CMIP5 Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project simulations

Quantify contribution of aerosol errors to cloud fraction biases in CMIP5 AMIP simulations: Contribution of AOD simulation errors to CMIP5 AMIP model CF biases

Evaluation and Bias Correction of the Secondary Inorganic Aerosol Modeling over North China Plain in Autumn and Winter

Verification of anthropogenic emissions of China by satellite and ground observations

Differences in East Asian summer monsoon responses to Asian aerosol forcing under different emission inventories

Aerosol optical properties of haze episodes in eastern China based on remote-sensing observations and WRF-Chem simulations

Incorrect Asian Aerosols Affecting the Attribution and Projection of Regional Climate Change in CMIP6 Models

Investigating Impact of Emission Inventories on PM2.5 Simulations over North China Plain by WRF-Chem

Simulating Aerosol–radiation–cloud Feedbacks on Meteorology and Air Quality over Eastern China under Severe Haze Conditionsin Winter

Air Quality and Climate Change, Topic 3 of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia Phase III (Mics-Asia III) – Part 2: Aerosol Radiative Effects and Aerosol Feedbacks