Abstract:Quantifying structural similarity between complex networks presents a fundamental and formidable challenge in network science, which plays a crucial role in various fields, such as bioinformatics, social science, and economics, and serves as an effective method for network classification, temporal network evolution and network generated model evaluation, etc. Traditional network comparison methods often rely on simplistic structural properties such as node degree and network distance. However, these methods only consider the local or global aspect of a network, leading to inaccuracies in network similarity assessments. In this paper, we introduce a network similarity comparison method based on the high-order structure. This innovative approach takes into account both the global and local structures of a network, resulting in a more comprehensive and accurate quantification of the network difference. Specifically, we construct distributions of higher-order clustering coeffcients and distance between nodes within a network. The JensenShannon divergence, based on these two distributions, is used to quantitatively measure the similarity between two networks, offering a more refined and robust measure of network similarity. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conducted a series of comprehensive experiments on both artificial and real-world networks, spanning various domains and applications. By meticulously fine-tuning the parameters associated with three distinct artificial network generation models, we systematically compared the performance of our method under a wide range of parameter settings within the same network. In addition, we generated four different network models with varying levels of randomization, creating a diverse set of test cases to evaluate the method's robustness and adaptability. In artificial networks, our study rigorously compared our proposed method with other baseline techniques, consistently demonstrating its superior accuracy and stability through experimental results; In real networks, we selected datasets from diverse domains and confirmed the reliability of our method by conducting extensive similarity assessments between real networks and their perturbed reconstructed counterparts. Furthermore, in real networks, the rigorous comparison between our method and null models underscored its robustness and stability across a broad spectrum of scenarios and applications. Finally, a meticulous sensitivity analysis of the parameters revealed that our method exhibited remarkable performance consistency across networks of different types, scales, and complexities.

The Self-Similarity of the Multilayer Networks

A Tree-Structured Deterministic Self-Similar Network.

Measure Of Layer Centrality In Multilayer Network

Entropy and enumeration of spanning connected unicyclic subgraphs in self-similar network

The Self-Similarity of Complex Networks: from the View of Degree–degree Distance

Analysing Motifs in Multilayer Networks

Research on Network Similarity Comparison Method Based on Higher-Order Information

Emergence of Scale-Free Close-Knit Friendship Structure in Online Social Networks

Common neighbour structure and similarity intensity in complex networks

Discrimination universally determines reconstruction of multiplex networks

A principled approach for weighted multilayer network aggregation

Finding Overlapping Communities in Multilayer Networks

Multi-fractal Analysis of Weighted Networks

Testing common invariant subspace of multilayer networks

Correlated structural evolution within multiplex networks

A New Structure Entropy Of Complex Networks Based On Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics And Similarity Of Nodes

Analysis of the Synchronizability of Two-Layer Chain Networks with Two Inter-Layer Edges

Fractal networks: Topology, dimension, and complexity

On a Class of Stochastic Multilayer Networks.

A network community detection method with integration of data from multiple layers and node attributes

Multilayer Networks Science:Concepts,Theories and Data