Combinatorial Analysis of Multiple Networks

Matteo Magnani,Barbora Micenkova,Luca Rossi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1303.4986
2013-03-21
Abstract:The study of complex networks has been historically based on simple graph data models representing relationships between individuals. However, often reality cannot be accurately captured by a flat graph model. This has led to the development of multi-layer networks. These models have the potential of becoming the reference tools in network data analysis, but require the parallel development of specific analysis methods explicitly exploiting the information hidden in-between the layers and the availability of a critical mass of reference data to experiment with the tools and investigate the real-world organization of these complex systems. In this work we introduce a real-world layered network combining different kinds of online and offline relationships, and present an innovative methodology and related analysis tools suggesting the existence of hidden motifs traversing and correlating different representation layers. We also introduce a notion of betweenness centrality for multiple networks. While some preliminary experimental evidence is reported, our hypotheses are still largely unverified, and in our opinion this calls for the availability of new analysis methods but also new reference multi-layer social network data.
Social and Information Networks,Physics and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to analyze the complex relationships in multi - layer networks more accurately, and it proposes a new methodology to deal with this problem. Specifically, the paper focuses on: 1. **Multidimensional understanding of individual centrality**: The paper proposes that the centrality of an individual in a network depends not only on the relationships at a single level, but on the combined effect of multiple different types of social relationships. For example, in a multi - level network, the shortest path between A and D may not be directly connected through LinkedIn, but through two Facebook edges, because Facebook carries more interactions, making these two steps faster than a single step on LinkedIn. In addition, some nodes (such as C) may be in the middle of multiple potential paths, which will affect their betweenness centrality in different networks and their combinations (H1). 2. **Multi - level identification of communities**: The paper assumes that when considering specific level combinations, communities may emerge. Although there are multiple community detection algorithms, these algorithms are usually not effective when dealing with online relationships. The paper believes that this is because a large number of semantically different levels are considered simultaneously during the analysis, resulting in the existence of hidden communities (H2). By selecting a specific two - level combination, more obvious clustering phenomena can be observed. 3. **Inter - dependence between levels**: Different level combinations may be interdependent. Being active on two different networks may not bring the same importance. For example, a person's contacts on a specific network may be the same as his contacts on two other social media sites, which means that spending time on this network may not increase the value of his social experience (H3). To verify the above hypotheses, the paper introduced a real - world data set that depicts five different types of relationships between individuals and treats it as a multi - layer graph. The researchers applied the existing multi - layer data distance functions and defined a new measurement standard - multi - layer betweenness centrality - to extend the concept of traditional betweenness centrality and consider paths across multiple different levels. In addition, the paper also studied the change in the ability to identify meaningful clusters when considering specific level combinations. Overall, this paper aims to reveal the hidden patterns in multi - layer networks by proposing new analysis methods and tools, thereby improving the understanding of the organizational structure of complex systems.